The journal of international advanced otology · 2015
Value of Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Tympanomastoid Cholesteatoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yiğiter Ali Cihan, Pınar Ercan, İmre Abdülkadir, Erdoğan Nezahat
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of echo-planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (EP-DWI) and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in the detection and localization of cholesteatoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients were prospectively included in this study. Patients with suspected primary or residual cholesteatoma were evaluated by EP-DWI and HRCT before tympanomastoid surgery. Radiological findings were correlated with intraoperative findings.
RESULTS: EP-DWI and HRCT accurately predicted the presence or absence of cholesteatoma in 49 of 54 (90.7%) and 37 of 54 (68.5%) patients, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of EP-DWI were 88.4%, 92.8%, 92%, and 89.6%, respectively. However, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of HRCT were 69%, 67.8%, 66.6%, and 73.07%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that EP-DWI is more reliable in predicting the presence and localization of cholesteatoma compared with HRCT, before tympanomastoid surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients were prospectively included in this study. Patients with suspected primary or residual cholesteatoma were evaluated by EP-DWI and HRCT before tympanomastoid surgery. Radiological findings were correlated with intraoperative findings.
RESULTS: EP-DWI and HRCT accurately predicted the presence or absence of cholesteatoma in 49 of 54 (90.7%) and 37 of 54 (68.5%) patients, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of EP-DWI were 88.4%, 92.8%, 92%, and 89.6%, respectively. However, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of HRCT were 69%, 67.8%, 66.6%, and 73.07%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that EP-DWI is more reliable in predicting the presence and localization of cholesteatoma compared with HRCT, before tympanomastoid surgery.