MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11547-018-0928-x

Медицинская библиотека · La Radiologia medica · 2018

Impact of low-kVp scan technique on oral contrast density at abdominopelvic CT.

Sheafor Douglas H, Kovacs Mark D, Burchett Philip, Picard Melissa M, Davis Brenton, Hardie Andrew D

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To assess quantitative and qualitative effects of kVp on oral contrast density.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Three readers retrospectively reviewed 100 CT scans performed at a range of high- and low-energy settings, independently determining their preferred window and level settings for evaluation of the oral-contrast-opacified bowel. Contrast density was also assessed quantitatively in the stomach, jejunum, and ileum. Subsequently, a range of oral contrast dilutions were imaged at varying kVp's in a commercially available CIRS tissue equivalent phantom model.

RESULTS

In the retrospective patient study, mean oral contrast density increased significantly in the ileum compared to the jejunum (455.2 and 308.8 HU, respectively, p < 0.01). Similar findings were seen in patients regardless of patients' weight. Mean oral contrast density was higher on lower-energy scans, requiring more window/level adjustment. An oral contrast iodine concentration of 5.82-7.77 mg I/mL most closely approximated a target oral contrast density of 200 HU.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral contrast density is strongly influenced by kVp, supporting use of more dilute oral contrast when using lower-kVp techniques.

Для цитирования: Sheafor Douglas H, Kovacs Mark D, Burchett Philip, Picard Melissa M, Davis Brenton, Hardie Andrew D. Impact of low-kVp scan technique on oral contrast density at abdominopelvic CT.. La Radiologia medica. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-018-0928-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.