European radiology · 2024
An unenhanced 3D-FLAIR sequence using long repetition time and constant flip angle to image endolymphatic hydrops.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhao Menglong, Jiang Huaili, Zhang Shujie, Liu Kai, Zhou Lei, Wu Di, Wen Xixi, Hu Junpu, Wang Xuan, Liu Zhuang, Sha Yan, Zeng Mengsu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (3D-FLAIR) sequence using a long repetition time (TR) and constant flip angle (CFA) in differentiating between perilymph and endolymph in a phantom study, and unenhanced endolymphatic hydrops (EH) imaging in a patient study.
METHODS: Three solutions in similar ion and protein concentrations with endolymph, perilymph, and cerebrospinal fluid were prepared for variable flip angle (VFA) 3D-FLAIR (TR 10,000 ms) and CFA (120°) 3D-FLAIR using different TR (10,000, 16,000, and 20,000 ms). Fifty-two patients with probable or definite Meniere's disease received unenhanced CFA (120°) 3D-FLAIR using a long TR (20,000 ms) and 4-h-delay enhanced CFA (120°) 3D-FLAIR (TR 16,000 ms). Image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of them were compared. Agreement in the evaluation of the EH degree between them was analyzed.
RESULTS: In the phantom study, CNRs between perilymphatic and endolymphatic samples of VFA 3D-FLAIR (TR 10,000 ms) and CFA 3D-FLAIR (TR 10,000, 16,000, and 20,000 ms) were 6.66 ± 1.30, 17.90 ± 2.76, 23.87 ± 3.09, and 28.22 ± 3.15 (p < 0.001). In patient study, average score (3.65 ± 0.48 vs. 4.19 ± 0.40), SNR (34.56 ± 9.80 vs. 51.40 ± 11.27), and CNR (30.66 ± 10.55 vs. 45.08 ± 12.27) of unenhanced 3D-FLAIR were lower than enhanced 3D-FLAIR (p < 0.001). Evaluations of the two sequences showed excellent agreement in the cochlear and vestibule (Kappa value: 0.898 and 0.909).
CONCLUSIONS: The CFA 3D-FLAIR sequence using a long TR could be used in unenhanced EH imaging with high accuracy.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Unenhanced imaging of endolymphatic hydrops is valuable in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients, especially those who cannot receive contrast-enhanced MRI.
KEY POINTS: Ion and protein concentration differences can be utilized in differentiating endolymph and perilymph on MRI. Endolymphatic and perilymphatic samples could be differentiated in vitro on this 3D-FLAIR sequence. This unenhanced 3D-FLAIR sequence is in excellent agreement with the enhanced constant flip angle 3D-FLAIR sequence.
METHODS: Three solutions in similar ion and protein concentrations with endolymph, perilymph, and cerebrospinal fluid were prepared for variable flip angle (VFA) 3D-FLAIR (TR 10,000 ms) and CFA (120°) 3D-FLAIR using different TR (10,000, 16,000, and 20,000 ms). Fifty-two patients with probable or definite Meniere's disease received unenhanced CFA (120°) 3D-FLAIR using a long TR (20,000 ms) and 4-h-delay enhanced CFA (120°) 3D-FLAIR (TR 16,000 ms). Image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of them were compared. Agreement in the evaluation of the EH degree between them was analyzed.
RESULTS: In the phantom study, CNRs between perilymphatic and endolymphatic samples of VFA 3D-FLAIR (TR 10,000 ms) and CFA 3D-FLAIR (TR 10,000, 16,000, and 20,000 ms) were 6.66 ± 1.30, 17.90 ± 2.76, 23.87 ± 3.09, and 28.22 ± 3.15 (p < 0.001). In patient study, average score (3.65 ± 0.48 vs. 4.19 ± 0.40), SNR (34.56 ± 9.80 vs. 51.40 ± 11.27), and CNR (30.66 ± 10.55 vs. 45.08 ± 12.27) of unenhanced 3D-FLAIR were lower than enhanced 3D-FLAIR (p < 0.001). Evaluations of the two sequences showed excellent agreement in the cochlear and vestibule (Kappa value: 0.898 and 0.909).
CONCLUSIONS: The CFA 3D-FLAIR sequence using a long TR could be used in unenhanced EH imaging with high accuracy.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Unenhanced imaging of endolymphatic hydrops is valuable in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients, especially those who cannot receive contrast-enhanced MRI.
KEY POINTS: Ion and protein concentration differences can be utilized in differentiating endolymph and perilymph on MRI. Endolymphatic and perilymphatic samples could be differentiated in vitro on this 3D-FLAIR sequence. This unenhanced 3D-FLAIR sequence is in excellent agreement with the enhanced constant flip angle 3D-FLAIR sequence.