Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2024
Diagnostic feasibility of middle cerebral artery stenosis or occlusion evaluated by TCCS and CEUS: Repeatability, reproducibility, and diagnostic agreement with DSA.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Lei, Pu Tianning, Xu Xiaotong, Raynald, Zheng Shuai, Fu Jingjing, Yong Qiang, Zhang Wei, He Wen
Аннотация
AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of transcranial color-coded sonography (TCCS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in assessing middle cerebral artery (MCA) stem stenosis or occlusion compared to digital subtraction angiography (DSA).
METHODS: A total of 48 cases including 96 MCAs suspected stem stenosis or obstruction in the MCA were assessed by TCCS, CE-TCCS, and DSA. The diameters of the most severe stenosis (Ds), proximal normal artery (Dn), and diameter stenosis rate of MCA were measured using both the color doppler flow imaging (CDFI) modality of TCCS or CEUS and the CEUS imaging modality. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were evaluated, and a weighted Kappa value was used to evaluate the intra-observer agreement, inter-observer agreement, agreement between CDFI modality and DSA stenosis or occlusion, and agreement between CEUS imaging modality and DSA stenosis or occlusion.
RESULTS: The ICC results indicated excellent repeatability and reproducibility (all ICCs > 0.75; weighted Kappa values >0.81). Compared with DSA, the weighted Kappa values and 95 % CIs of stenosis (the first measurement was taken by two observers) of CDFI modality and CEUS imaging modality were 0.175 (0.041, 0.308) and 0.779 (0.570, 0.988) for observers A and 0.181 (0.046, 0.316) and 0.779 (0.570, 0.988) for observers B respectively.
CONCLUSION: This study indicates that inter- and intra-observer agreements were good for the direct method of measuring percentages of MCA stenosis by TCCS and CEUS. CEUS imaging modality is a new and reliable imaging modality approach to evaluate the MCAs stenosis and occlusion.
METHODS: A total of 48 cases including 96 MCAs suspected stem stenosis or obstruction in the MCA were assessed by TCCS, CE-TCCS, and DSA. The diameters of the most severe stenosis (Ds), proximal normal artery (Dn), and diameter stenosis rate of MCA were measured using both the color doppler flow imaging (CDFI) modality of TCCS or CEUS and the CEUS imaging modality. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were evaluated, and a weighted Kappa value was used to evaluate the intra-observer agreement, inter-observer agreement, agreement between CDFI modality and DSA stenosis or occlusion, and agreement between CEUS imaging modality and DSA stenosis or occlusion.
RESULTS: The ICC results indicated excellent repeatability and reproducibility (all ICCs > 0.75; weighted Kappa values >0.81). Compared with DSA, the weighted Kappa values and 95 % CIs of stenosis (the first measurement was taken by two observers) of CDFI modality and CEUS imaging modality were 0.175 (0.041, 0.308) and 0.779 (0.570, 0.988) for observers A and 0.181 (0.046, 0.316) and 0.779 (0.570, 0.988) for observers B respectively.
CONCLUSION: This study indicates that inter- and intra-observer agreements were good for the direct method of measuring percentages of MCA stenosis by TCCS and CEUS. CEUS imaging modality is a new and reliable imaging modality approach to evaluate the MCAs stenosis and occlusion.