MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2000

Management of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Parks R W, Tzovaras G, Diamond T, Rowlands B J

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This review analyses the outcome for patients with acute and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts managed in two major referral centres.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

From 1987 to 1997, 33 patients were treated with either acute (n = 19) or chronic (n = 14) pseudocysts. Procedures performed included cystgastrostomy (64%), cystduodenostomy (6%), cystjejunostomy (3%), distal pancreatectomy with resection of pseudocyst (12%), laparotomy with external drainage (9%), endoscopic transpapillary stenting (3%) and endoscopic pancreatic duct sphincterotomy with percutaneous drainage of the pseudocyst (3%).

RESULTS

All patients had resolution of their pseudocyst and no patient developed recurrence. There were no deaths in this series. There was a 9% incidence of major complications and a 21% incidence of minor complications. Outcome was excellent in 63% and good in 27% of patients. Two patients (6%) had persistent chronic pain and one patient (3%) had evidence of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency with malabsorption.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts can be performed safely with low morbidity and mortality provided patients are carefully selected and their medical management is optimized. Although minimally invasive techniques now offer a variety of treatment options, open surgical drainage is still indicated for a significant number of cases.

Для цитирования: Parks R W, Tzovaras G, Diamond T, Rowlands B J. Management of pancreatic pseudocysts.. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2000.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.