Histopathology · 1997
Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the thymus.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chetty R, Batitang S, Govender D
Аннотация
AIM: We highlight the occurrence of an unusual neuroendocrine tumour, a large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, arising from the thymus.
CASE DETAILS: A 68-year-old man with a history of cigarette smoking had a large mediastinal tumour arising from the thymus removed. Two years later the tumour recurred; it was debulked surgically but the patient died 2 months later: Histological examination of both tumour specimens revealed a tumour with an endocrine pattern, composed of large pleomorphic cells with large nuclei and prominent nucleoli. The mitotic count ranged from 19 to 26 per 10 high-power fields and large tracks of coagulative tumour necrosis were present. The tumour cells were strongly positive for neuron-specific enolase (NSE), chromogranin, CAM5.2 and AE1/3, with cytoplasmic dot-like accentuation for the latter three markers. The tumour fulfilled the criteria for a diagnosis of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma should be distinguished from atypical carcinoid and small cell carcinoma. It is a distinctive neuroendocrine malignancy with a prognosis between that of atypical carcinoid and small cell carcinoma, and needs to be treated aggressively.
CASE DETAILS: A 68-year-old man with a history of cigarette smoking had a large mediastinal tumour arising from the thymus removed. Two years later the tumour recurred; it was debulked surgically but the patient died 2 months later: Histological examination of both tumour specimens revealed a tumour with an endocrine pattern, composed of large pleomorphic cells with large nuclei and prominent nucleoli. The mitotic count ranged from 19 to 26 per 10 high-power fields and large tracks of coagulative tumour necrosis were present. The tumour cells were strongly positive for neuron-specific enolase (NSE), chromogranin, CAM5.2 and AE1/3, with cytoplasmic dot-like accentuation for the latter three markers. The tumour fulfilled the criteria for a diagnosis of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma should be distinguished from atypical carcinoid and small cell carcinoma. It is a distinctive neuroendocrine malignancy with a prognosis between that of atypical carcinoid and small cell carcinoma, and needs to be treated aggressively.