Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging facilitates the selection of patients prior to fertility-sparing management of endometrial cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) versus multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for the staging of well-differentiated endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC) in potential candidates for fertility-sparing management.

METHODS

This multi-center retrospective study included 48 potential candidates for fertility-sparing management (age <46 years, grade 1 endometroid EC) who did not wish to undergo fertility-sparing management and thus underwent definitive surgery. Two readers (R1, R2) independently reviewed bpMRI (T1, T2, and diffusion-weighted imaging) and mpMRI (bpMRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, DCE) during two separate sessions spaced one month apart for the presence of myometrial invasion (MI), cervical stromal involvement (CSI), malignant adnexal disease (mAD), and pelvic lymphadenopathy (pLNM). Each reader also recorded maximum tumor diameter, tumor volume, and tumor-to-uterine volume ratio (TVR) on T2-weighted imaging. The diagnostic performance of bpMRI and mpMRI was determined for each reader with surgical pathology serving as a gold standard.

RESULTS

The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for bpMRI versus mpMRI was 0.76/0.78 (R1/R2) versus 0.84/0.83 for MI, 0.79/0.76 versus 0.99/0.80 for CSI, 0.84/0.84 versus 0.84/0.80 for mAD, and 0.82/0.82 for pLMN. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for detecting tumor spread beyond the endometrium were 71%/77% and 71%/65% for bpMRI (R1/R2) vs. 84%/90% and 71%/65% for mpMRI (R1/R2), respectively. The AUC of maximum tumor diameter, tumor volume, and TVR for MI was 0.71/0.61, 0.73/0.75, and 0.75/0.77 for R1/R2, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MRI had moderate diagnostic performance across potential candidates for fertility-sparing treatment of EC. mpMRI outperformed bpMRI for detecting EC spreading beyond the endometrium.