Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 1994
Primary fallopian tube carcinoma--a retrospective survey of 51 cases. Austrian Cooperative Study Group for Fallopian Tube Carcinoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Klein M, Rosen A, Graf A, Lahousen M, Kucera H, Pakisch B, Vavra N, Beck A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate retrospectively the importance of invasion beyond the basement membrane on overall survival in Fallopian tube carcinoma and its influence on the necessity of postoperative adjuvant therapy (stage 0 vs. stage I).
DESIGN: In a nationwide analysis the data of 51 patients were evaluated. The participating departments provided the study center with histologic specimens. A re-staging was done according to the FIGO-classification for Fallopian tube carcinomas. Stage 0 patients received no further postoperative therapy, in stage I patients were divided in 2 groups to evaluate the impact of postoperative adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy vs. irradiation).
RESULTS: Patients of stage 0 had a significantly better prognosis than patients of stage I (p = 0.035). Stage I patients treated by irradiation showed a significantly better prognosis than patients treated by chemotherapy (p = 0.017).
CONCLUSION: Tumour penetration through the basement membrane causes prognosis to deteriorate significantly (5-year survival rate about 50% in stage I). Postoperative therapy is thus indicated with stage I disease. Irradiation seems to give better results than chemotherapy.
DESIGN: In a nationwide analysis the data of 51 patients were evaluated. The participating departments provided the study center with histologic specimens. A re-staging was done according to the FIGO-classification for Fallopian tube carcinomas. Stage 0 patients received no further postoperative therapy, in stage I patients were divided in 2 groups to evaluate the impact of postoperative adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy vs. irradiation).
RESULTS: Patients of stage 0 had a significantly better prognosis than patients of stage I (p = 0.035). Stage I patients treated by irradiation showed a significantly better prognosis than patients treated by chemotherapy (p = 0.017).
CONCLUSION: Tumour penetration through the basement membrane causes prognosis to deteriorate significantly (5-year survival rate about 50% in stage I). Postoperative therapy is thus indicated with stage I disease. Irradiation seems to give better results than chemotherapy.