Gastroenterology · 2025
A Novel, IBS-Specific IgG ELISA-Based Elimination Diet in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Singh Prashant, Chey William D, Takakura Will, Cash Brooks D, Lacy Brian E, Quigley Eamonn M M, Randall Charles W, Lembo Anthony
Аннотация
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Personalized dietary therapies for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are needed and an immunoglobulin (Ig)G-antibody-based elimination diet presents a potential solution. However, existing studies have serious methodological limitations. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of an elimination diet by using a novel IBS-specific IgG assay.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial enrolling subjects with IBS from 8 centers. Subjects positive for ≥1 food on an 18-food IgG assay and an average daily abdominal pain intensity score between 3.0 and 7.5 on an 11.0-point scale during a 2-week run-in period were randomized to either an experimental antibody-guided diet or sham diet for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was a ≥30% decrease in abdominal pain intensity for ≥2 of the last 4 weeks of the treatment period.
RESULTS: Among 238 randomized subjects with IBS, 223 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. A significantly greater proportion of subjects in the experimental diet group met the primary outcome than those in the sham diet group (59.6% vs 42.1%, P = .02). Subgroup analysis revealed that a higher proportion of subjects with constipation-predominant IBS and IBS with mixed bowel habits in the experimental diet group met the primary endpoint vs the sham group (67.1% vs 35.8% and 66% vs 29.5%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Subjects on an IgG-guided elimination diet were more likely to achieve the primary endpoint than those on a sham elimination diet. Subgroup analysis suggests a more robust benefit for subjects with constipation-predominant IBS and IBS with mixed bowel habits. This highlights the potential effectiveness of a personalized elimination diet based on a novel IBS-specific IgG assay. A larger study is warranted to validate these observations. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number NCT03459482.).
METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial enrolling subjects with IBS from 8 centers. Subjects positive for ≥1 food on an 18-food IgG assay and an average daily abdominal pain intensity score between 3.0 and 7.5 on an 11.0-point scale during a 2-week run-in period were randomized to either an experimental antibody-guided diet or sham diet for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was a ≥30% decrease in abdominal pain intensity for ≥2 of the last 4 weeks of the treatment period.
RESULTS: Among 238 randomized subjects with IBS, 223 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. A significantly greater proportion of subjects in the experimental diet group met the primary outcome than those in the sham diet group (59.6% vs 42.1%, P = .02). Subgroup analysis revealed that a higher proportion of subjects with constipation-predominant IBS and IBS with mixed bowel habits in the experimental diet group met the primary endpoint vs the sham group (67.1% vs 35.8% and 66% vs 29.5%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Subjects on an IgG-guided elimination diet were more likely to achieve the primary endpoint than those on a sham elimination diet. Subgroup analysis suggests a more robust benefit for subjects with constipation-predominant IBS and IBS with mixed bowel habits. This highlights the potential effectiveness of a personalized elimination diet based on a novel IBS-specific IgG assay. A larger study is warranted to validate these observations. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number NCT03459482.).