MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/jcm14051437

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical medicine · 2025

Atherectomy in the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease-A Case Series to Demonstrate Preferable Indications with Good Outcomes and a Literature Review.

Lizwan Marco, Yap Hao Yun, Ch'ng Jack Kian, Chong Tze Tec, Ng Nick Zhi Peng

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Background

Endovascular therapy for lower-limb arterial disease is widely performed today. A vast array of sheaths, catheters, wires, balloon types, stents, and tools such as atherectomy, thrombectomy, and lithotripsy devices are now available to achieve the best outcomes in terms of vessel patency and ultimately limb salvage. The use of atherectomy devices, however, has raised some controversies in terms of outcome efficacy, cost effectiveness, and safety profile in various series and studies. Objectively, the types and disease pattern in these studies are also greatly heterogeneous.

Methods

Here, we reported three cases which exemplify how these atherectomy devices have served as a valuable tool, especially for patients with complex and heavily calcified lesions.

Results

The three cases highlighted scenarios where atherectomy displayed good outcomes, each involving the use of atherectomy devices to treat highly calcified vessels.

Conclusions

Despite the concerns with atherectomy devices, we believe that with proper selection, patients will benefit most from their ability to achieve the best outcomes of both vessel patency and limb salvage.

Для цитирования: Lizwan Marco, Yap Hao Yun, Ch'ng Jack Kian, Chong Tze Tec, Ng Nick Zhi Peng. Atherectomy in the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease-A Case Series to Demonstrate Preferable Indications with Good Outcomes and a Literature Review.. Journal of clinical medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14051437.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.