MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00330-023-09842-3

Медицинская библиотека · European radiology · 2023

Interdisciplinary perspectives on computed tomography in sepsis: survey among medical doctors at a large university medical center.

Opper Hernando Maria Isabel, Witham Denis, Steinhagen Peter Richard, Angermair Stefan, Bauer Wolfgang, Compton Friederike, Edel Andreas, Kruse Jan, Kühnle York, Lachmann Gunnar, Marz Susanne, Müller-Redetzky Holger, Nee Jens, Paul Oliver, Praeger Damaris, Skurk Carsten, Stegemann Miriam, Uhrig Alexander, Wolf Stefan, Zimmermann Elke, Rubarth Kerstin, Bolanaki Myrto, Seybold Joachim, Dewey Marc, Pohlan Julian

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to describe physicians' perspectives on the use of computed tomography (CT) in patients with sepsis.

METHODS

In January 2022, physicians of a large European university medical center were surveyed using a web-based questionnaire asking about their views on the role of CT in sepsis. A total of 371 questionnaires met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed using work experience, workplace, and medical specialty of physicians as variables. Chi-square tests were performed.

RESULTS

Physicians considered the ability to detect an unknown focus as the greatest benefit of CT scans in sepsis (70.9%, n = 263/371). Two clinical criteria - "signs of decreased vigilance" (89.2%, n = 331/371) and "increased catecholamine demand" (84.7%, n = 314/371) - were considered highly relevant for a CT request. Elevated procalcitonin (82.7%, n = 307/371) and lactate levels (83.6%, n = 310/371) were consistently found to be critical laboratory values to request a CT. As long as there is evidence of infection in one organ region, most physicians (42.6%, n = 158/371) would order a CT scan based on clinical assessment. Combined examination of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was favored (34.8%, n = 129/371) in cases without clinical clues of an infection source. A time window of ≥ 1-6 h was preferred for both CT examinations (53.9%, n = 200/371) and CT-guided interventions (59.3%, n = 220/371) in patients with sepsis.

CONCLUSION

Despite much consensus, there are significant differences in attitudes towards the use of CT in septic patients among physicians from different workplaces and medical specialties. Knowledge of these perspectives may improve patient management and interprofessional communication.

KEY POINTS: Despite interdisciplinary consensus on the use of CT in sepsis, statistically significant differences in the responses are apparent among physicians from different workplaces and medical specialties. The detection of a previously unknown source of infection and the ability to plan interventions and/or surgery based on CT findings are considered key advantages of CT in septic patients. Timing of CT reflects the requirements of specific disciplines.

Для цитирования: Opper Hernando Maria Isabel, Witham Denis, Steinhagen Peter Richard, Angermair Stefan, Bauer Wolfgang, Compton Friederike, Edel Andreas, Kruse Jan, Kühnle York, Lachmann Gunnar, Marz Susanne, Müller-Redetzky Holger, Nee Jens, Paul Oliver, Praeger Damaris, Skurk Carsten, Stegemann Miriam, Uhrig Alexander, Wolf Stefan, Zimmermann Elke, Rubarth Kerstin, Bolanaki Myrto, Seybold Joachim, Dewey Marc, Pohlan Julian. Interdisciplinary perspectives on computed tomography in sepsis: survey among medical doctors at a large university medical center.. European radiology. 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09842-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.