MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jdv.15285

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2018

Evaluation of the agreement between TNM 7th and 8th in a population-based series of cutaneous melanoma.

Crocetti E, Stanganelli I, Mancini S, Vattiato R, Giuliani O, Ravaioli A, Balducci C, Falcini F, Pimpinelli N

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The 8th edition of TNM has introduced new rules for staging cutaneous melanoma.

OBJECTIVE

To compare TNM 7th and 8th editions in defining pathological stages of melanoma.

METHODS

A population-based series of 1847 skin melanoma from Romagna cancer registry (Italy) incident during 2003-2012 has been used to measure the agreement (with Cohen's kappa) between TNM 8th and 7th editions in defining melanoma stage. Disease-specific survival has been computed for each stage according to TNM 7th and 8th.

RESULTS

The agreement between the two TNM editions was quite good when considered on average (kappa = 70.7%), moderate for stage I (61.5%), nearly perfect for stage II (95.0%), but extremely poor for stage III (8.1%). The overall melanoma-specific observed survival was 90.8% at 5 year and 88.9% at 10 year with a strong prognostic effect of stage.

CONCLUSION

TNM 8th edition introduces several changes which do not seem really helpful in addressing the care of stage I melanoma and may complicate the definition and comparability of stage III.

Для цитирования: Crocetti E, Stanganelli I, Mancini S, Vattiato R, Giuliani O, Ravaioli A, Balducci C, Falcini F, Pimpinelli N. Evaluation of the agreement between TNM 7th and 8th in a population-based series of cutaneous melanoma.. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV. 2018. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15285.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.