British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing) · 2026
Colostomy formation for neurogenic bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury: a national survey.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Boucher Michelle
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Neurogenic bowel dysfunction significantly affects those living with spinal cord injury (SCI). Guidelines position colostomy as a last resort, but this is not reflected in current practice. Pathways and professional attitudes are inconsistent.
AIM: Explore the attitudes of health professionals towards colostomy as an option for people living with SCI.
METHODS: Online questionnaire for health professionals; descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.
RESULTS: 122 responses. Indications for colostomy: increasing independence (87%), intractable bowel difficulties (82%), patient choice (80%). Concerns regarded complications (71% overall), decisional regret (35% overall) and access to specialist nursing/lack of patient education (each 32% overall). Free-text analysis revealed themes of 'Lives transformed', 'Patient-centred choice', 'Right services, right reasons', 'Colostomy concerns', 'Health professionals' knowledge gaps', 'Differing perspectives' and 'Patient education is key'.
CONCLUSION: Attitudes to colostomy are shifting, however concerns and inconsistencies in pathways, knowledge and support persist. Guidance needs to evolve to reflect current practice and incorporate patient perspectives.
AIM: Explore the attitudes of health professionals towards colostomy as an option for people living with SCI.
METHODS: Online questionnaire for health professionals; descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.
RESULTS: 122 responses. Indications for colostomy: increasing independence (87%), intractable bowel difficulties (82%), patient choice (80%). Concerns regarded complications (71% overall), decisional regret (35% overall) and access to specialist nursing/lack of patient education (each 32% overall). Free-text analysis revealed themes of 'Lives transformed', 'Patient-centred choice', 'Right services, right reasons', 'Colostomy concerns', 'Health professionals' knowledge gaps', 'Differing perspectives' and 'Patient education is key'.
CONCLUSION: Attitudes to colostomy are shifting, however concerns and inconsistencies in pathways, knowledge and support persist. Guidance needs to evolve to reflect current practice and incorporate patient perspectives.