Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · 2011
The continent ileostomy: an alternative to end ileostomy? Short and long-term results of a single institution series.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Parc Yann, Klouche Mohamed, Bennis Malika, Lefèvre Jérémie H, Shields Conor, Tiret Emmanuel
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Total proctocolectomy, ensuring eradication of all diseased colorectal mucosa is the treatment of choice for ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis. Before the era of ileal pouch anal anastomosis, definitive ileostomy was required. The aim of this study is to define both early and late morbidity and the functional result of continent ileostomy.
METHODS: All patients' chart who had a continent ileostomy in our department were reviewed. The functional result was evaluated in 43 patients.
RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (34 women) with a mean age of 42 years (range: 17-69) underwent a continent ileostomy, 32 following a restorative proctocolectomy. The mean follow-up was 20.5 (range: 3-34) years. Seventeen patients (35%) experienced an early postoperative complication requiring reintervention in two patients. There was no mortality, and conversion to an end ileostomy was not required. Twenty-two patients developed late complications requiring 50 reoperations. The mean number of catheterisations per 24h was 4.4. The SF36 questionnaire showed values close to those of the general population.
CONCLUSION: Continent ileostomy carries a significant risk of non-severe complications. In selected patients, it represents a valuable alternative to an end ileostomy, in particular when restorative proctocolectomy has failed.
METHODS: All patients' chart who had a continent ileostomy in our department were reviewed. The functional result was evaluated in 43 patients.
RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (34 women) with a mean age of 42 years (range: 17-69) underwent a continent ileostomy, 32 following a restorative proctocolectomy. The mean follow-up was 20.5 (range: 3-34) years. Seventeen patients (35%) experienced an early postoperative complication requiring reintervention in two patients. There was no mortality, and conversion to an end ileostomy was not required. Twenty-two patients developed late complications requiring 50 reoperations. The mean number of catheterisations per 24h was 4.4. The SF36 questionnaire showed values close to those of the general population.
CONCLUSION: Continent ileostomy carries a significant risk of non-severe complications. In selected patients, it represents a valuable alternative to an end ileostomy, in particular when restorative proctocolectomy has failed.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Adenomatous Polyposis ColiAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnal CanalAnastomosis, SurgicalColitis, UlcerativeColonic PouchesCutaneous FistulaFecal IncontinenceFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIleostomyIleumIntestinal FistulaMaleMiddle AgedPouchitisProctocolectomy, RestorativeProsthesis FailureQuality of LifeReoperationRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsYoung Adult