Brachytherapy · 2022
Evaluating the accumulated dose distribution of organs at risk in combined radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma based on deformable image registration.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhao Tiandi, Chen Yi, Qiu Bin, Zhang Jiashuang, Liu Hao, Zhang Xile, Zhang Ruilin, Jiang Ping, Wang Junjie
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and value of deformable image registration (DIR) in calculating the cumulative doses of organs at risk (OARs) in the combined radiotherapy of cervical cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty cervical cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) combined with intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) were reviewed. The simulation CT images of EBRT and ICBT were imported into Varian Velocity 4.1 for the DIR-based dose accumulation. Cumulative dose-volume parameters of D2cc for rectum and bladder were compared between the direct addition (DA) and DIR methods. The quantitative parameters were measured to evaluate the accuracy of DIR.
RESULTS: The three-dimensional cumulative dose distribution of the tumor and OARs were graphically well illustrated by composite isodose lines. In combined EBRT and ICBT, the mean cumulative bladder D2cc calculated by DIR and DA was 86.13 Gy and 86.27 Gy, respectively. The mean cumulative rectal D2cc calculated by DIR and DA was 72.97 Gy and 73.90 Gy, respectively. No significant differences were noted between these two methods (p > 0.05). As to the parameters used to evaluate the DIR accuracy, the mean DSC, Jacobian, MDA (mm) and Hausdorff distance (mm) were 0.79, 1.0, 3.84, and 22.01 respectively for the bladder and 0.53, 1.2, 7.31, and 29.58 respectively for the rectum. In this study, the DSC seemed to be slightly lower compared with previous studies.
CONCLUSION: Dose accumulation based on DIR might be an alternative method to illustrate and evaluate the cumulative doses of the OARs in combined radiotherapy for cervical cancer. However, DIR should be used with caution before overcoming the relevant limitations.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty cervical cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) combined with intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) were reviewed. The simulation CT images of EBRT and ICBT were imported into Varian Velocity 4.1 for the DIR-based dose accumulation. Cumulative dose-volume parameters of D2cc for rectum and bladder were compared between the direct addition (DA) and DIR methods. The quantitative parameters were measured to evaluate the accuracy of DIR.
RESULTS: The three-dimensional cumulative dose distribution of the tumor and OARs were graphically well illustrated by composite isodose lines. In combined EBRT and ICBT, the mean cumulative bladder D2cc calculated by DIR and DA was 86.13 Gy and 86.27 Gy, respectively. The mean cumulative rectal D2cc calculated by DIR and DA was 72.97 Gy and 73.90 Gy, respectively. No significant differences were noted between these two methods (p > 0.05). As to the parameters used to evaluate the DIR accuracy, the mean DSC, Jacobian, MDA (mm) and Hausdorff distance (mm) were 0.79, 1.0, 3.84, and 22.01 respectively for the bladder and 0.53, 1.2, 7.31, and 29.58 respectively for the rectum. In this study, the DSC seemed to be slightly lower compared with previous studies.
CONCLUSION: Dose accumulation based on DIR might be an alternative method to illustrate and evaluate the cumulative doses of the OARs in combined radiotherapy for cervical cancer. However, DIR should be used with caution before overcoming the relevant limitations.