DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92406-x
Multicentre prospective controlled study of Barrett's oesophagus and colorectal adenomas. Groupe d'Etude de l'Oesophage de Barrett.
Аннотация
Previous studies have suggested that patients with Barrett's oesophagus may be at increased risk of colorectal neoplasia, though the association is disputed. In a multicentre prospective study we compared the prevalence of colorectal adenomas in patients with Barrett's oesophagus and controls. Barrett's oesophagus patients (n = 104) had histological confirmation of columnar epithelium extending more than 3 cm above the gastro-oesophageal junction. The 537 controls were patients with symptoms suggesting irritable bowel syndrome. No participant had a personal history of colonic neoplasm. Each patient underwent colonoscopy. Histologically proven adenomas were found in 26 Barrett's patients (25%) and 75 controls (14%). Three colorectal cancers were discovered in each group. The prevalence of adenomas was greater in the Barrett's oesophagus group than in the control group (p < 0.01) but the relation became non-significant after adjustment for age and sex and control for other known risk factors by a logistic regression model (odds ratio 1.4 [0.7-2.7]). The relative risk of adenoma was significantly higher in patients older than 59 than in younger patients (2.2 [1.3-3.5]) and in men than in women (3.4 [2.0-5.7]). Other factors contributing significantly to the risk of adenoma were a family history of colorectal cancer (2.3 [1.1-4.8]), rectal bleeding (2.1 [1.1-3.9]), previous colonic investigation (0.3 [0.1-0.7]), and complete as opposed to partial colonoscopy (6.4 [0.8-48.3]). We conclude that Barrett's oesophagus is not an independent risk factor for colorectal neoplasia and, therefore, is not, in itself an indication for colorectal screening.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.