DOI 10.1016/j.accpm.2018.01.001
Comparison of techniques for visualisation of the airway anatomy for ultrasound-assisted intubation: A prospective study of emergency department patients.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Ultrasound has been shown to be a highly accurate adjunct for confirming endotracheal tube (ETT) placement, however there is no universally accepted scanning technique. The objective of this study was to determine which ultrasound technique provides the highest rate of adequate airway visualisation in a sample of stable emergency department (ED) patients.
METHODS
We conducted a prospective observational study using a convenience sample of ED patients. Airway imaging was performed using the following five techniques: 1) transcricothryoid membrane (TCM), 2) suprasternal notch (SSN) without transducer pressure, 3) SSN with pressure, 4) SSN with pressure to the left of the trachea and 5) SSN with pressure to the right of the trachea. A blinded reviewer scored the adequacy of airway visualisation for each technique.
RESULTS
A total of 100 patients were enrolled in the study. SSN to the left of the trachea with pressure had the highest rate of adequate airway visualisation (93.0%, 95% CI 86.1-97.1%), followed by 82.0% (95% CI 73.1-89.0%) for SSN with pressure, 74.0% (95% CI 64.3-82.3%) for TCM, 44.0% (95% CI 34.1-54.3%) for SSN without pressure, and 1.0% (95% CI 0.0-5.4%) for SSN to the right of the trachea. In 76.0% (95% CI 66.4-84.0%) of patients, the SSN view was improved by moving the probe off the midline towards the patient's left.
CONCLUSIONS
In a sample of ED patients, the airway anatomy relevant for use in endotracheal intubation is best visualised at the SSN to the left of the trachea with transducer pressure applied.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.