MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bcr-2026-275291

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ case reports · 2026

Cerebrovascular injury following manual strangulation and subsequent cervical manipulation: challenges in attribution and imaging decisions.

Reese Patrick John, Magee Ryan Michael, Nelson Peter R, Staubus Leslie S

СтатьяКлинический случайПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Cervical artery dissection (CAD) causes approximately 2% of ischaemic strokes overall but up to 25% in adults younger than 50 years. Isolated head or neck pain without infarction occurs in 8%-12% of cases and may contribute to delayed diagnosis. CAD has been described following manual strangulation and chiropractic manipulation. A woman in her 30s who presented with persistent headache following repeated intimate partner violence-related strangulation was initially discharged after a negative head CT. After subsequent chiropractic cervical manipulation, CT angiography demonstrated distal intradural vertebral artery dissection with bilateral cervical internal carotid artery aneurysms. Because vascular imaging was not obtained before chiropractic manipulation, the temporal relationship between strangulation, manipulation and CAD cannot be established. This illustrates the challenge of attributing cerebrovascular injury in patients exposed to multiple insults and supports careful clinical assessment and a lower threshold for vascular imaging in selected patients with persistent symptoms following strangulation-related trauma.

Для цитирования: Reese Patrick John, Magee Ryan Michael, Nelson Peter R, Staubus Leslie S. Cerebrovascular injury following manual strangulation and subsequent cervical manipulation: challenges in attribution and imaging decisions.. BMJ case reports. 2026. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2026-275291.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.