MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3174/ajnr.a0587

Медицинская библиотека · AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2007

Monitoring of gustatory stimulation of salivary glands by diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison of 1.5T and 3T.

Habermann C R, Gossrau P, Kooijman H, Graessner J, Cramer M C, Kaul M G, Reitmeier F, Jaehne M, Adam G

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to compare different field strengths monitoring physiologic changes due to oral stimulation of parotid glands by using diffusion-weighted (DW) echo-planar imaging (EPI).

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were examined with a DW-EPI sequence at 1.5T and 3T before and after oral stimulation with commercially available lemon juice. The b factors used were 0, 500, and 1000 s/mm(2). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were evaluated with a manually placed region of interest including the entire parotid gland. For comparison of results, a Student t test was used on the basis of the mean of the volunteer median values. To compare both field strengths, we calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient (r).

RESULTS

DW-EPI MR imaging visualized the parotid glands of all volunteers. With 1.5T, the mean ADC before stimulation was 1.12 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s +/- 0.08 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. After stimulation with lemon juice, the ADC increased to 1.18 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s +/- 0.09 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. For 3T, the ADC before stimulation was 1.14 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s +/- 0.04 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, with an increase to 1.17 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s +/- 0.05 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s after stimulation. For both field strengths, the increase in ADC after stimulation was significant (P < .001). High correlations between both field strengths were found pre- and poststimulation (r = 0.955, and 0.936, respectively).

CONCLUSION

DW-EPI MR imaging allows monitoring of physiologic changes due to oral stimulation of parotid glands by using DW imaging with high correlation between 1.5T and 3T.

Для цитирования: Habermann C R, Gossrau P, Kooijman H, Graessner J, Cramer M C, Kaul M G, Reitmeier F, Jaehne M, Adam G. Monitoring of gustatory stimulation of salivary glands by diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison of 1.5T and 3T.. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. 2007. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a0587.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.