MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/oem.29.2.160

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of industrial medicine · 1972

Lung dust and lung iron contents of coal workers in different coalfields in Great Britain.

Bergman I, Casswell C

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Bergman, I., and Casswell, C. (1972).Brit. J. industr. Med.,29, 160-168. Lung dust and lung iron contents of coal workers in different coalfields in Great Britain. Lung dust analyses from seven coalfields are studied and it is found that the average dust composition varies significantly with the rank of coal. The higher the rank, the higher the coal percentage and the lower the quartz percentage of the lung dust. This holds for all coalfields except in Scotland, where the lung dust contains mainly soot instead of coal. Samples of airborne dust collected at the coalface in different coalfields show a similar but small variability of composition with rank of coal, and the results from Scotland are in good agreement with the results from other coalfields. The amount of iron in simple pneumoconiosis lungs is related to their mineral and coal contents and to the factor `years underground'. The strongest relationship is with coal and mineral for coalface workers from England. For pit accident cases (all simple pneumoconiosis) mineral is important as well as years underground, while for simple pneumoconiosis cases from Scotland, years underground is the most important factor.

Для цитирования: Bergman I, Casswell C. Lung dust and lung iron contents of coal workers in different coalfields in Great Britain.. British journal of industrial medicine. 1972. DOI: 10.1136/oem.29.2.160.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.