Journal of minimally invasive gynecology · 2015
Laparoscopic Ureteroneocystostomy: Be Prepared!
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bourdel Nicolas, Cognet Stephanie, Canis Michel, Berdugo Olivier, Botchorishvili Revaz, Rabischong Benoit, Jardon Kris
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes and complications of laparoscopic ureteroneocystotomy in gynecologic surgery.
DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed all medical records of patients who underwent ureteroneocystostomy between April 2008 and May 2012.
DESIGN CLASSIFICATION: Retrospective case series study.
SETTING: A university tertiary care hospital.
PATIENTS: Nine patients underwent ureteroneocystostomy: 3 patients had ureteral endometriosis stenoses; and 6 patients had iatrogenic ureter injuries.
INTERVENTIONS: All procedures were performed laparoscopically. The ureterovesical re-implantation was unilateral in 8 cases and bilateral for 1 patient.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean operating time was 226.7 min (range, 120-480). Average blood loss was 114.4 mL (range, 30-400). The mean duration of the in-dwelling catheter was 10.4 days (range, 7-21); the average hospital stay was 12.6 days (range, 6-26). The mean duration of the ureteral double J stent was 7.8 weeks (range, 6-16). One patient was re-operated for vaginal and laparoscopic drainage of a pelvic abscess on the sixth postoperative day. The median follow-up time was 20.8 months (range, 9-36), No patient had stenosis or breakdown of a suture line.
CONCLUSIONS: Our series confirms the feasibility and the effectiveness of laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy. This minimally invasive approach, which avoids laparotomy, requires a multidisciplinary team.
DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed all medical records of patients who underwent ureteroneocystostomy between April 2008 and May 2012.
DESIGN CLASSIFICATION: Retrospective case series study.
SETTING: A university tertiary care hospital.
PATIENTS: Nine patients underwent ureteroneocystostomy: 3 patients had ureteral endometriosis stenoses; and 6 patients had iatrogenic ureter injuries.
INTERVENTIONS: All procedures were performed laparoscopically. The ureterovesical re-implantation was unilateral in 8 cases and bilateral for 1 patient.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean operating time was 226.7 min (range, 120-480). Average blood loss was 114.4 mL (range, 30-400). The mean duration of the in-dwelling catheter was 10.4 days (range, 7-21); the average hospital stay was 12.6 days (range, 6-26). The mean duration of the ureteral double J stent was 7.8 weeks (range, 6-16). One patient was re-operated for vaginal and laparoscopic drainage of a pelvic abscess on the sixth postoperative day. The median follow-up time was 20.8 months (range, 9-36), No patient had stenosis or breakdown of a suture line.
CONCLUSIONS: Our series confirms the feasibility and the effectiveness of laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy. This minimally invasive approach, which avoids laparotomy, requires a multidisciplinary team.