Cognitive outcomes of infusion therapies in Parkinson's disease: A comprehensive systematic review.

BACKGROUND

Device-aided therapies, such as levodopa-and apomorphine-based infusion pumps, are widely used for managing patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) with symptoms inadequately controlled by oral medications. Cognitive impairment is a critical factor in selecting an appropriate therapy; however, the effects of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) and continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI) on cognitive function remain debated.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is twofold: i) to provide a comprehensive analysis of the short-term benefits of device-aided infusion therapies on cognitive function, and ii) to evaluate their impact on long-term cognitive trajectories.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. Narrative synthesis was applied to summarize results.

RESULTS

Out of 1911 studies, 33 were included in this systematic review according to the selected criteria. No studies examined the effects of the newly introduced Foslevodopa/Foscarbidopa (LDp/CDp) nor levodopa/entacapone/carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG) pump therapy. Seventeen studies addressed the short-term effects of CSAI; seven reported cognitive slowing and two were suggestive of positive effects. Only two studies assessed its impact on long-term cognitive trajectory, showing no significant changes. Thirteen studies examined LCIG's short-term effects; seven reported cognitive changes, with some decreases in executive functions. Two studies explored its long-term cognitive impact, with one reporting improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

The cognitive effects of device-aided treatments in PD show substantial variability, and their impact on cognitive function, processing speed, attention, and memory is inconsistent, with some studies reporting impairments and others indicating stability or slight improvements. The heterogeneity in study designs, neuropsychological assessments and coexisting vascular and amyloid pathology further complicates interpretation, underscoring the need for more controlled investigations.