MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1404393

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2014

Early versus on-demand nasoenteric tube feeding in acute pancreatitis.

Bakker Olaf J, van Brunschot Sandra, van Santvoort Hjalmar C, Besselink Marc G, Bollen Thomas L, Boermeester Marja A, Dejong Cornelis H, van Goor Harry, Bosscha Koop, Ahmed Ali Usama, Bouwense Stefan, van Grevenstein Wilhelmina M, Heisterkamp Joos, Houdijk Alexander P, Jansen Jeroen M, Karsten Thom M, Manusama Eric R, Nieuwenhuijs Vincent B, Schaapherder Alexander F, van der Schelling George P, Schwartz Matthijs P, Spanier B W Marcel, Tan Adriaan, Vecht Juda, Weusten Bas L, Witteman Ben J, Akkermans Louis M, Bruno Marco J, Dijkgraaf Marcel G, van Ramshorst Bert, Gooszen Hein G, Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Early enteral feeding through a nasoenteric feeding tube is often used in patients with severe acute pancreatitis to prevent gut-derived infections, but evidence to support this strategy is limited. We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing early nasoenteric tube feeding with an oral diet at 72 hours after presentation to the emergency department in patients with acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with acute pancreatitis who were at high risk for complications on the basis of an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 8 or higher (on a scale of 0 to 71, with higher scores indicating more severe disease), an Imrie or modified Glasgow score of 3 or higher (on a scale of 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating more severe disease), or a serum C-reactive protein level of more than 150 mg per liter. Patients were randomly assigned to nasoenteric tube feeding within 24 hours after randomization (early group) or to an oral diet initiated 72 hours after presentation (on-demand group), with tube feeding provided if the oral diet was not tolerated. The primary end point was a composite of major infection (infected pancreatic necrosis, bacteremia, or pneumonia) or death during 6 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 208 patients were enrolled at 19 Dutch hospitals. The primary end point occurred in 30 of 101 patients (30%) in the early group and in 28 of 104 (27%) in the on-demand group (risk ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.44; P=0.76). There were no significant differences between the early group and the on-demand group in the rate of major infection (25% and 26%, respectively; P=0.87) or death (11% and 7%, respectively; P=0.33). In the on-demand group, 72 patients (69%) tolerated an oral diet and did not require tube feeding.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial did not show the superiority of early nasoenteric tube feeding, as compared with an oral diet after 72 hours, in reducing the rate of infection or death in patients with acute pancreatitis at high risk for complications. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development and others; PYTHON Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN18170985.).

Для цитирования: Bakker Olaf J, van Brunschot Sandra, van Santvoort Hjalmar C, Besselink Marc G, Bollen Thomas L, Boermeester Marja A, Dejong Cornelis H, van Goor Harry, Bosscha Koop, Ahmed Ali Usama, Bouwense Stefan, van Grevenstein Wilhelmina M, Heisterkamp Joos, Houdijk Alexander P, Jansen Jeroen M, Karsten Thom M, Manusama Eric R, Nieuwenhuijs Vincent B, Schaapherder Alexander F, van der Schelling George P, Schwartz Matthijs P, Spanier B W Marcel, Tan Adriaan, Vecht Juda, Weusten Bas L, Witteman Ben J, Akkermans Louis M, Bruno Marco J, Dijkgraaf Marcel G, van Ramshorst Bert, Gooszen Hein G, Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Early versus on-demand nasoenteric tube feeding in acute pancreatitis.. The New England journal of medicine. 2014. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1404393.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.