MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1408758

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2014

Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease.

De Bruyne Bernard, Fearon William F, Pijls Nico H J, Barbato Emanuele, Tonino Pim, Piroth Zsolt, Jagic Nikola, Mobius-Winckler Sven, Rioufol Gilles, Witt Nils, Kala Petr, MacCarthy Philip, Engström Thomas, Oldroyd Keith, Mavromatis Kreton, Manoharan Ganesh, Verlee Peter, Frobert Ole, Curzen Nick, Johnson Jane B, Limacher Andreas, Nüesch Eveline, Jüni Peter, FAME 2 Trial Investigators

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that in patients with stable coronary artery disease and stenosis, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed on the basis of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) would be superior to medical therapy.

METHODS

In 1220 patients with stable coronary artery disease, we assessed the FFR in all stenoses that were visible on angiography. Patients who had at least one stenosis with an FFR of 0.80 or less were randomly assigned to undergo FFR-guided PCI plus medical therapy or to receive medical therapy alone. Patients in whom all stenoses had an FFR of more than 0.80 received medical therapy alone and were included in a registry. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization within 2 years.

RESULTS

The rate of the primary end point was significantly lower in the PCI group than in the medical-therapy group (8.1% vs. 19.5%; hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.57; P<0.001). This reduction was driven by a lower rate of urgent revascularization in the PCI group (4.0% vs. 16.3%; hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.38; P<0.001), with no significant between-group differences in the rates of death and myocardial infarction. Urgent revascularizations that were triggered by myocardial infarction or ischemic changes on electrocardiography were less frequent in the PCI group (3.4% vs. 7.0%, P=0.01). In a landmark analysis, the rate of death or myocardial infarction from 8 days to 2 years was lower in the PCI group than in the medical-therapy group (4.6% vs. 8.0%, P=0.04). Among registry patients, the rate of the primary end point was 9.0% at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stable coronary artery disease, FFR-guided PCI, as compared with medical therapy alone, improved the outcome. Patients without ischemia had a favorable outcome with medical therapy alone. (Funded by St. Jude Medical; FAME 2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01132495.).

Для цитирования: De Bruyne Bernard, Fearon William F, Pijls Nico H J, Barbato Emanuele, Tonino Pim, Piroth Zsolt, Jagic Nikola, Mobius-Winckler Sven, Rioufol Gilles, Witt Nils, Kala Petr, MacCarthy Philip, Engström Thomas, Oldroyd Keith, Mavromatis Kreton, Manoharan Ganesh, Verlee Peter, Frobert Ole, Curzen Nick, Johnson Jane B, Limacher Andreas, Nüesch Eveline, Jüni Peter, FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease.. The New England journal of medicine. 2014. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1408758.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.