Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2007
Clinical evaluation of the zygoma implant: 3-year follow-up at 16 clinics.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kahnberg Karl-Erik, Henry Patric J, Hirsch Jan-Mikael, Ohrnell Lars-Olov, Andreasson Lars, Brånemark Per-Ingvar, Chiapasco Matteus, Gynther Göran, Finne Kaj, Higuchi Kenji W, Isaksson Sten, Malevez Chantal, Neukam Friedrich W, Sevetz Edward, Urgell Juan P, Widmark Göran, Bolind Pia
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical investigation was to evaluate the treatment outcome with zygoma implants with regard to implant survival, patient satisfaction, and function of prosthesis replacement after 3 years.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The treatment outcome of 76 patients treated with 145 zygoma fixtures at 16 centers was evaluated with regard to implant survival. Status of peri-implant mucosa and amount of plaque were registered annually. Patients' and dentists' evaluations of the functional and esthetic outcome of the treatment were assessed at delivery of prosthesis and thereafter at each follow-up visit.
RESULTS: Sixty of 76 patients were followed for 3 years after prosthetic delivery. Five of 145 placed zygoma implants failed during the course of the study resulting in an overall implant survival rate of 96.3%. At the 3-year follow-up, 75% of the implants sites were registered with normal peri-implant mucosa and 68% with no visible plaque. The patients were fully satisfied with the esthetic and functional outcome of the treatment in 86% and 71%, respectively, at the 3-year follow-up visit. All reported data from dentists scored from acceptable to excellent.
CONCLUSION: The multicenter study showed a high predictability of the zygoma implant-supported rehabilitation.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The treatment outcome of 76 patients treated with 145 zygoma fixtures at 16 centers was evaluated with regard to implant survival. Status of peri-implant mucosa and amount of plaque were registered annually. Patients' and dentists' evaluations of the functional and esthetic outcome of the treatment were assessed at delivery of prosthesis and thereafter at each follow-up visit.
RESULTS: Sixty of 76 patients were followed for 3 years after prosthetic delivery. Five of 145 placed zygoma implants failed during the course of the study resulting in an overall implant survival rate of 96.3%. At the 3-year follow-up, 75% of the implants sites were registered with normal peri-implant mucosa and 68% with no visible plaque. The patients were fully satisfied with the esthetic and functional outcome of the treatment in 86% and 71%, respectively, at the 3-year follow-up visit. All reported data from dentists scored from acceptable to excellent.
CONCLUSION: The multicenter study showed a high predictability of the zygoma implant-supported rehabilitation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAlveolar Bone LossDental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantsDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedDenture, CompleteFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansJaw, EdentulousMaleMaxillaMaxillary DiseasesMaxillary SinusMaxillofacial Prosthesis ImplantationMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeZygoma