MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3171/2009.3.jns081651

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neurosurgery · 2009

Emergency transorbital ventricular puncture: refinement of external landmarks.

Tubbs R Shane, Loukas Marios, Shoja Mohammadali M, Cohen-Gadol Aaron A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECT: Emergency access to the ventricular system is sometimes necessary for the treatment of raised intracranial pressure with ensuing herniation. One procedure described in the literature is a transorbital approach performed using a spinal needle. Because past publications have been case reports with minimal definition of external landmarks, the present study was performed.

METHODS

Five adult cadavers (10 sides) underwent transorbital puncture of the lateral ventricles. This approach was performed following an axial section through the cranium that exposed the lateral ventricular system. Landmarks for the ideal placement of catheters into the ventricular system were then evaluated.

RESULTS

The authors found that the lateral ventricular system was consistently entered just superior to the level of the foramen of Monro by puncturing the roof of the orbit just medial to a midpupillary line, with the trajectory of the perforation aimed 45 degrees from a horizontal line and 15-20 degrees medial to a vertical line.

CONCLUSIONS

Although it is uncommon, transorbital ventriculostomy may be used in emergency cases of raised intracranial pressure. Such refined landmarks as described in the present study may be of use to the neurosurgeon.

Для цитирования: Tubbs R Shane, Loukas Marios, Shoja Mohammadali M, Cohen-Gadol Aaron A. Emergency transorbital ventricular puncture: refinement of external landmarks.. Journal of neurosurgery. 2009. DOI: 10.3171/2009.3.jns081651.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.