[Value of computer-assisted slide-screening system in ThinPrep cervical cytology].
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the value of computer-assisted slide-screening system (ThinPrep imaging system, TIS) in the diagnosis of cervical Thinprep smears.
METHODS
A total of 19 600 ThinPrep smears were collected, including 9800 slides by TIS-assisted screening from September 2011 to March 2012 and 9800 slides by manual screening from September 2010 to April 2011 as control. The detection rates of abnormal cells and common microbial infection by the different screening methods were compared. With histopathological diagnosis of colposcopic biopsy as the gold standard, the screening efficiency and correlation of cytologic diagnosis among different screening methods were analyzed.
RESULTS
Compared with manual screening, the detection rate of abnormal cells in 9800 cases by TIS-assisted screen was increased from 5.4% (525/9800) to 6.8% (665/9800), mainly in the categories of ASCUS and LSIL (P < 0.05). TIS had a higher accordance rate between cytologic diagnosis and histopathological diagnosis in the NILM and ASCUS than that by manual screening. False-negative rate of finding abnormal cells by TIS decreased from 8.5% (17/200) to 0.7% (2/289, P < 0.01) with an increased sensitivity compared to manual screening, although the specificity was similar. Both TIS and manual screening had advantages and disadvantages respectively in the detection of microbial organisms. TIS improved screening efficiency by 50%.
CONCLUSION
TIS improves not only the screening efficiency but also the detection of abnormal cells with a reduced false negativity, and it therefore has a broad application prospect.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.