MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.18926/amo/43827

Медицинская библиотека · Acta medica Okayama · 2011

CT assessment of subtypes of pulmonary emphysema in females.

Togami Taro, Yamamoto Yuka, Satoh Katashi, Kameyama Reiko, Murota Makiko, Kimura Naruhide, Nishiyama Yoshihiro

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We performed a retrospective study examining the prevalence and subtypes of pulmonary emphysema (PE) identified by computed tomography (CT) in females. We reviewed the records of 1,687 female subjects who had undergone CT. They were divided into the following 2 age groups:group A (<50 years) and group B (≥50 years). PE was diagnosed by the presence of low-attenuation areas using visual assessment (grades 0-3) on CT images. Two subtypes of PE were observed:centrilobular emphysema (CLE) and paraseptal emphysema (PSE). PE was divided into the following 3 categories:I (CLE or CLE-predominant);II (CLE and PSE of equal extent);and III (PSE or PSE-predominant). PE was found in 64 of 274 smokers (23.3%) and 54 of 1,413 non-smokers (3.8%). In smoking subjects, when grades 1 and 2 were grouped together as mild PE, the mean age for CT grade 3 (severe PE) was significantly higher than that for mild PE. In group A, category III predominated, whereas category I was more prevalent in group B, in both smoking and non-smoking subjects. A high incidence of PE was found in smoking subjects as compared with non-smoking subjects. PSE predominated in younger subjects, whereas CLE predominated in older subjects.

Для цитирования: Togami Taro, Yamamoto Yuka, Satoh Katashi, Kameyama Reiko, Murota Makiko, Kimura Naruhide, Nishiyama Yoshihiro. CT assessment of subtypes of pulmonary emphysema in females.. Acta medica Okayama. 2011. DOI: 10.18926/amo/43827.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.