Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2018
Mohs micrographic surgery with melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1) immunostaining for atypical intraepidermal melanocytic proliferation.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Etzkorn Jeremy R, Jew Olivia S, Shin Thuzar M, Sobanko Joseph F, Neal Donald E, Miller Christopher J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for atypical intraepidermal melanocytic proliferation (AIMP) is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the frequency of diagnostic change to melanoma (upstaging) and the frequency of local recurrence after MMS for AIMP. A secondary outcome was the frequency of subclinical spread (defined as the requirement for >1 stage of MMS to achieve tumor-free margins).
METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional study of 223 AIMP (with 92.4% located on the head, neck, hand, foot, or pretibial leg) patients treated with MMS with melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1) immunostaining.
RESULTS: Upstaging to unequivocal melanoma in situ or invasive melanoma was identified in 18.8% (42/223) of all AIMP patients. The local recurrence rate was 0% (0/223) with a mean follow-up time of 2.7 years (998 days). Subclinical spread was present in 23.8% (53/223) of AIMP patients.
LIMITATIONS: Single site, retrospective design, observational study, lack of objective criteria to diagnose AIMP.
CONCLUSION: MMS with MART-1 immunostaining achieves excellent local control of specialty site AIMP and permits definitive removal of subclinical spread before reconstruction. The central debulking excision should be evaluated with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded section staining, since a significant percentage of AIMP are reclassified as melanoma in situ or invasive melanoma.
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the frequency of diagnostic change to melanoma (upstaging) and the frequency of local recurrence after MMS for AIMP. A secondary outcome was the frequency of subclinical spread (defined as the requirement for >1 stage of MMS to achieve tumor-free margins).
METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional study of 223 AIMP (with 92.4% located on the head, neck, hand, foot, or pretibial leg) patients treated with MMS with melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1) immunostaining.
RESULTS: Upstaging to unequivocal melanoma in situ or invasive melanoma was identified in 18.8% (42/223) of all AIMP patients. The local recurrence rate was 0% (0/223) with a mean follow-up time of 2.7 years (998 days). Subclinical spread was present in 23.8% (53/223) of AIMP patients.
LIMITATIONS: Single site, retrospective design, observational study, lack of objective criteria to diagnose AIMP.
CONCLUSION: MMS with MART-1 immunostaining achieves excellent local control of specialty site AIMP and permits definitive removal of subclinical spread before reconstruction. The central debulking excision should be evaluated with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded section staining, since a significant percentage of AIMP are reclassified as melanoma in situ or invasive melanoma.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, NeoplasmBiopsyCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic ErrorsEpidermisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHutchinson's Melanotic FreckleMART-1 AntigenMaleMelanocytesMelanomaMiddle AgedMohs SurgeryNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrecancerous ConditionsRetrospective StudiesSkin NeoplasmsT-LymphocytesYoung Adult