MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ftd.0b013e3181b2c8cf

Медицинская библиотека · Therapeutic drug monitoring · 2009

A therapeutic drug monitoring algorithm for refining the imatinib trough level obtained at different sampling times.

Wang Yanfeng, Chia Yen Lin, Nedelman Jerry, Schran Horst, Mahon Francois-Xavier, Molimard Mathieu

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Correlation analyses have demonstrated that maintaining an adequate imatinib (IM) trough concentration would be important for clinical response in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Kit-positive gastrointestinal stromal tumors. The objectives of the current work were to use a pharmacokinetic model to refine the trough levels obtained at different sampling times and to propose a therapeutic drug monitoring algorithm and an acceptable sampling time window for imatinib trough sampling.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetics of IM in patients (pts) with CML were characterized based on historical data from a Phase III study. In the elimination phase the concentration of IM (C(t)) follows a mono-exponential decline, and the standardized trough concentration (C(min,std) = C(tau)) can be described by a simple algorithm C(min,std) = C(t)* exp(k(e) x Delta t), where Delta t = t - tau, and tau is 24 hours for qd or 12 hours for bid dosing and k(e) is the elimination rate constant. The percent deviation of C(t) from C(min,std) was simulated for different Delta t and k(e) values to define a sampling time window Delta t, within which the percent deviation is <20%.

RESULTS

Simulation analysis shows that C(t) is largely dependent on Delta t and k(e). The percent deviation of C(t) at 3 hours before or after tau from C(min,std) will be 7.1%, 13.1%, and 23.4% for pts with low, typical, and high k(e) values, 0.023/hour, 0.041/hour, and 0.070/hour, respectively. However, if a correction is made for C(t) by the algorithm using the typical k(e) value of 0.041 per hour, the percent deviation at 3 hours will be reduced to 5.3%, 0%, and 9.1% for pts with low, typical, and high k(e) values, respectively. Even if the sampling window is extended to +/-6 hours, the corresponding percent deviation will still be reasonable: 10.2%, 0%, and 19.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

By using the algorithm, the pharmacokinetic sampling window can be extended to a wider window to make the trough sampling easy to implement in the clinical setting, provided that the sampling time and dosing time are accurately recorded.

Для цитирования: Wang Yanfeng, Chia Yen Lin, Nedelman Jerry, Schran Horst, Mahon Francois-Xavier, Molimard Mathieu. A therapeutic drug monitoring algorithm for refining the imatinib trough level obtained at different sampling times.. Therapeutic drug monitoring. 2009. DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0b013e3181b2c8cf.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.