MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.09.002

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of oral biology · 2006

Effects of cevimeline on salivation and thirst in conscious rats.

Sato Nao, Ono Kentaro, Haga Kensuke, Yokota Makoto, Inenaga Kiyotoshi

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Intraperitoneal injection of a sialogogue, pilocarpine, at high concentrations induces salivation via peripheral pathways and thirst sensation via central pathways. In this study, we report that the effects of another sialagogue, cevimeline, on salivation and water intake in conscious rats differ from those of pilocarpine.

DESIGN

We investigated that effects of peripherally and centrally injected cevimeline on parotid saliva flow rate and water intake in conscious rats. The results were compared with those of pilocarpine.

RESULTS

The intraperitoneal injection of cevimeline induced salivation from the parotid gland, but not water intake. In contrast, the intracerebroventricular injection of cevimeline induced water intake without salivation. The concentration of cevimeline needed to induce salivation by intraperitoneal injection was several 10 times that of pilocarpine, but that needed to induce water intake by intracerebroventricular injection was over a 1000 times greater.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding that intraperitoneally injected cevimeline induces salivation without inducing water intake, suggests that the effects on the thirst center in the brain are weaker than those of pilocarpine.

Для цитирования: Sato Nao, Ono Kentaro, Haga Kensuke, Yokota Makoto, Inenaga Kiyotoshi. Effects of cevimeline on salivation and thirst in conscious rats.. Archives of oral biology. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.09.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.