American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2009
A randomized controlled trial of cervical scanning vs history to determine cerclage in women at high risk of preterm birth (CIRCLE trial).
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Simcox Rachael, Seed Paul T, Bennett Phillip, Teoh T G, Poston Lucilla, Shennan Andrew H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare history-indicated placement of cervical cerclage based on history- vs ultrasound-indicated placement in women at risk of preterm birth.
STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of history-indicated cervical cerclage suture based on history (clinician preference) vs ultrasound (< 20 mm cervical length) indicated in women at increased risk.
RESULTS: The incidence of the primary outcome, preterm delivery between 24(+0) and 33(+6) weeks, was similar: 19/125 (15%) in the history-indicated group vs 18/122 (15%) in the ultrasound-indicated group (relative risk [RR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.76). Those women randomized to the ultrasound-indicated arm were significantly more likely to receive a cerclage (32% vs 19%; RR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.07-2.47) and progesterone (39% vs 25%; RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.06-2.25).
CONCLUSION: Screening women at high risk with cervical ultrasound to determine cerclage placement results in more intervention but similar outcome compared with history-indicated placement.
STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of history-indicated cervical cerclage suture based on history (clinician preference) vs ultrasound (< 20 mm cervical length) indicated in women at increased risk.
RESULTS: The incidence of the primary outcome, preterm delivery between 24(+0) and 33(+6) weeks, was similar: 19/125 (15%) in the history-indicated group vs 18/122 (15%) in the ultrasound-indicated group (relative risk [RR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.76). Those women randomized to the ultrasound-indicated arm were significantly more likely to receive a cerclage (32% vs 19%; RR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.07-2.47) and progesterone (39% vs 25%; RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.06-2.25).
CONCLUSION: Screening women at high risk with cervical ultrasound to determine cerclage placement results in more intervention but similar outcome compared with history-indicated placement.