MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3341/kjo.2023.0014

Медицинская библиотека · Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2023

Clinical Implication of Dacryoendoscopy in the Patients with Tearing: A Systematic Review.

Kim Yuri, Park Jeong Yoon, Lew Helen

Систематический обзорСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: A systematic review of the literature on diagnostic and therapeutic indications, techniques, and complications of dacryoendoscopy (DE) was performed.

METHODS

The authors performed a PubMed search of articles published in English on DE. Data were collected and classified according to the categories of the disease. The clinical outcomes and limitations were particularly analyzed.

RESULTS

The lacrimal drainage system from the canaliculus to the inferior meatus could be examined based on the specific anatomical features by DE. The canalicular mucosa is smooth and brightly colored, the lacrimal sac shows covering mucosa with good vascularization and the nasolacrimal duct is lined with bright tubular mucosal folds. DE allows direct visualization of the detailed internal condition of the lacrimal disorders, to directly diagnose the site of obstruction with accuracy and address the causes and recanalize the lacrimal drainage system using assisted micro lacrimal surgical instruments in the tearing patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Better visualization of the lacrimal canal with DE improves the understanding of physiology and precise identification of the obstructing lesions, both of which are the key to a comprehensive management for the tearing patients.

Для цитирования: Kim Yuri, Park Jeong Yoon, Lew Helen. Clinical Implication of Dacryoendoscopy in the Patients with Tearing: A Systematic Review.. Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO. 2023. DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2023.0014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.