European radiology experimental · 2025
MRI radiomic study on prediction of nonenlarged lymph node metastasis of rectal cancer: reduced field-of-view versus conventional DWI.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Qu Weinuo, Wang Jing, Hu Xuemei, Shen Yaqi, Peng Yang, Hu Daoyu, Li Zhen
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Nonenlarged lymph node metastasis (NELNM) of rectal cancer is easily overlooked because these apparently normal lymph nodes are sometimes too small to measure directly using imaging techniques. Radiomic-based multiparametric imaging sequences could predict NELNM based on the primary lesion of rectal cancer. We aimed to study the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics derived from reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging (rDWI) and conventional DWI (cDWI) for the prediction of NELNM.
METHODS: A total of 86 rectal cancer patients (60 and 26 patients in training and test cohorts, respectively), underwent multiparametric MRI. Radiomic features were extracted from the whole primary lesion of rectal cancer segmented on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), rDWI, and cDWI, both with b-value of 800 s/mm2 and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps from both DWI sequences (rADC and cADC). The radiomic models based on the above imaging methods were built for the assessment of NELNM status. Their diagnostic performances were evaluated in comparison with subjective evaluation by radiologists.
RESULTS: rADC demonstrated a significant advantage over subjective assessment in predicting NELNM in both training and test cohorts (p ≤ 0.002). In the test cohort, rADC exhibited a significantly higher area under the receiver operating characteristics curve than cADC, cDWIb800, and T2WI (p ≤ 0.020) in assessing NELNM for region-of-interest (ROI) delineation while excelling over rDWIb800 for prediction of NELNM (p = 0.0498).
CONCLUSION: Radiomic features based on rADC outperformed those derived from T2WI and fDWI in predicting the NELNM status of rectal cancer, rADC was more advantageous than rDWIb800 in assessing NELNM.
RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Advanced rDWI excelled over cDWI in radiomic assessment of NELNM of rectal cancer, with the best performance observed for rADC, in contrast to rDWIb800, cADC, cDWIb800, and T2WI.
KEY POINTS: rDWI, cDWI, and T2WI radiomics could help assess NELNM of rectal cancer. Radiomic features based on rADC outperformed those based on rDWIb800, cADC, cDWIb800, and T2WI in predicting NELNM. For rDWI radiomics, the ADC map was more accurate and reliable than DWI to assess NELNM for region of interest delineation.
METHODS: A total of 86 rectal cancer patients (60 and 26 patients in training and test cohorts, respectively), underwent multiparametric MRI. Radiomic features were extracted from the whole primary lesion of rectal cancer segmented on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), rDWI, and cDWI, both with b-value of 800 s/mm2 and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps from both DWI sequences (rADC and cADC). The radiomic models based on the above imaging methods were built for the assessment of NELNM status. Their diagnostic performances were evaluated in comparison with subjective evaluation by radiologists.
RESULTS: rADC demonstrated a significant advantage over subjective assessment in predicting NELNM in both training and test cohorts (p ≤ 0.002). In the test cohort, rADC exhibited a significantly higher area under the receiver operating characteristics curve than cADC, cDWIb800, and T2WI (p ≤ 0.020) in assessing NELNM for region-of-interest (ROI) delineation while excelling over rDWIb800 for prediction of NELNM (p = 0.0498).
CONCLUSION: Radiomic features based on rADC outperformed those derived from T2WI and fDWI in predicting the NELNM status of rectal cancer, rADC was more advantageous than rDWIb800 in assessing NELNM.
RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Advanced rDWI excelled over cDWI in radiomic assessment of NELNM of rectal cancer, with the best performance observed for rADC, in contrast to rDWIb800, cADC, cDWIb800, and T2WI.
KEY POINTS: rDWI, cDWI, and T2WI radiomics could help assess NELNM of rectal cancer. Radiomic features based on rADC outperformed those based on rDWIb800, cADC, cDWIb800, and T2WI in predicting NELNM. For rDWI radiomics, the ADC map was more accurate and reliable than DWI to assess NELNM for region of interest delineation.