MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3233/shti260814

Медицинская библиотека · Studies in health technology and informatics · 2026

Radiologist-Large Language Model Collaboration in Dermatologic Ultrasound Reporting: Evaluating the Clinical Utility of ChatGPT.

Şanal Çamur İstem, Çamur Eren

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored in medical imaging, but their reliability in independently interpreting images remains uncertain. This study evaluated the clinical utility of radiology reports generated under three reporting conditions using dermatologic ultrasound images: Condition 1 (radiologist's reporting), Condition 2 (LLM reporting based solely on the ultrasound image), and Condition 3 (LLM reporting using both the ultrasound image and the radiologist's report). A total of 202 dermatologic ultrasound images from a public dataset were analyzed. Reports were evaluated for diagnostic accuracy, appropriateness of next-step recommendations, and readability. Diagnostic accuracy was highest in Condition 3 (83.2%), compared with Condition 1 (55.4%) and Condition 2 (26.2%) (p<0.001). Next-step suggestion accuracy was also highest in Condition 3 (77.7%), followed by Condition 2 (59.9%) and Condition 1 (38.6%) (p<0.001). Report readability was also highest in Condition 3. Integrating LLM outputs with radiologist reports may improve clinical communication and decision support in dermatologic ultrasound.

Для цитирования: Şanal Çamur İstem, Çamur Eren. Radiologist-Large Language Model Collaboration in Dermatologic Ultrasound Reporting: Evaluating the Clinical Utility of ChatGPT.. Studies in health technology and informatics. 2026. DOI: 10.3233/shti260814.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.