Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2013
Human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 and the prognosis of patients with stage I cervical cancer.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zampronha Rossana de Araújo Catão, Freitas-Junior Ruffo, Murta Eddie Fernando Candido, Michelin Márcia Antoniazi, Barbaresco Aline Almeida, Adad Sheila Jorge, Oliveira Amaurillo Monteiro de, Rassi Amanda B, Oton Glória Jabur Bittar
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to evaluate the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 in women with clinical stage IB cervical cancer treated by radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy as well as to establish a correlation between HPV type and cancer prognosis.
METHODS: A single-center cohort study was conducted with 86 patients who had undergone radical hysterectomy for stage I cervical cancer. Prognostic factors and the presence of HPV 16 and 18 were analyzed using a polymerase chain reaction assay. A univariate analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves was conducted to estimate survival.
RESULTS: The prevalence of HPV 16 in the study group was 65.3%, and the prevalence of HPV 18 was 33.3%. The prevalence of infection with both viruses was 26.9%. Overall survival at 5 years was 91% among women with HPV 18 and 96% among those without this virus type (p=0.133). Among the women with HPV 16, the overall survival was 94%, whereas this rate was 96% among those without this virus type (p=0.663). Disease-free survival was unaffected by the presence of HPV type 16 or 18.
CONCLUSION: In the present study, despite the high prevalence of HPV types 16 and 18, the presence of these virus types did not affect the prognosis of patients with stage I cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy.
METHODS: A single-center cohort study was conducted with 86 patients who had undergone radical hysterectomy for stage I cervical cancer. Prognostic factors and the presence of HPV 16 and 18 were analyzed using a polymerase chain reaction assay. A univariate analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves was conducted to estimate survival.
RESULTS: The prevalence of HPV 16 in the study group was 65.3%, and the prevalence of HPV 18 was 33.3%. The prevalence of infection with both viruses was 26.9%. Overall survival at 5 years was 91% among women with HPV 18 and 96% among those without this virus type (p=0.133). Among the women with HPV 16, the overall survival was 94%, whereas this rate was 96% among those without this virus type (p=0.663). Disease-free survival was unaffected by the presence of HPV type 16 or 18.
CONCLUSION: In the present study, despite the high prevalence of HPV types 16 and 18, the presence of these virus types did not affect the prognosis of patients with stage I cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultBrazilCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansHysterectomy, VaginalKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPapillomavirus InfectionsParaffin EmbeddingPolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of TestsTime FactorsUterine Cervical Neoplasms