Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) · 1998
c-myc is not useful as prognostic immunohistochemical marker in cutaneous melanoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Böni R, Bantschapp O, Müller B, Burg G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Several studies indicate that immunohistochemical detection of the c-myc oncogene might serve as an additional prognostic marker in malignant melanoma.
OBJECTIVE: To study c-myc expression in paraffin-embedded cutaneous melanoma and to correlate to metastatic potential and onset of metastases.
METHODS: Cytoplasmic c-myc protein expression was visualized using the APAPP method, and reactivity (percent total tumor cells stained) was assessed in 62 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary cutaneous melanomas (21 not metastasizing, mean Breslow 3.0 +/- 2.9 mm, 41 metastasizing, mean Breslow 3.1 +/- 3.0 mm) and 24 metastases of the same patients.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference of c-myc reactivity in cutaneous melanoma who did not metastasize (n = 21, c-myc reactivity 32.7 +/- 19.3%, follow-up 10.6 +/- 1.8 years) and primaries who metastasized (n = 41, c-myc reactivity 27.7 +/- 22.4%, p = 0.29). This finding was independent of the thickness of the primary and was found within thin cutaneous melanoma with a Breslow, < 0.75 mm (range 0.24-0.65 mm, n = 20, c-myc reactivity 29.1 +/- 15.7%, p = 0.32) or within thick cutaneous melanoma with a Breslow > 1.5 mm (range 1.6-11 mm, n = 41, c-myc reactivity 29.6 +/- 23.8%, p = 0.46). No correlation of c-myc expression between thin cutaneous melanoma, thick cutaneous melanoma (p = 0.83) or metastasizing primaries and their metastases (n = 24, c-myc reactivity 29.3 +/- 22%) was found (p = 0.64). The time period until development of first metastasis did not correlate with the percentage of cells expressing c-myc in the primary (p = 0.56).
CONCLUSION: c-myc expression is independent of metastatic potential and onset of metastases and, therefore, does not serve as a prognostic immunohistochemical marker in primary cutaneous melanoma.
OBJECTIVE: To study c-myc expression in paraffin-embedded cutaneous melanoma and to correlate to metastatic potential and onset of metastases.
METHODS: Cytoplasmic c-myc protein expression was visualized using the APAPP method, and reactivity (percent total tumor cells stained) was assessed in 62 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary cutaneous melanomas (21 not metastasizing, mean Breslow 3.0 +/- 2.9 mm, 41 metastasizing, mean Breslow 3.1 +/- 3.0 mm) and 24 metastases of the same patients.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference of c-myc reactivity in cutaneous melanoma who did not metastasize (n = 21, c-myc reactivity 32.7 +/- 19.3%, follow-up 10.6 +/- 1.8 years) and primaries who metastasized (n = 41, c-myc reactivity 27.7 +/- 22.4%, p = 0.29). This finding was independent of the thickness of the primary and was found within thin cutaneous melanoma with a Breslow, < 0.75 mm (range 0.24-0.65 mm, n = 20, c-myc reactivity 29.1 +/- 15.7%, p = 0.32) or within thick cutaneous melanoma with a Breslow > 1.5 mm (range 1.6-11 mm, n = 41, c-myc reactivity 29.6 +/- 23.8%, p = 0.46). No correlation of c-myc expression between thin cutaneous melanoma, thick cutaneous melanoma (p = 0.83) or metastasizing primaries and their metastases (n = 24, c-myc reactivity 29.3 +/- 22%) was found (p = 0.64). The time period until development of first metastasis did not correlate with the percentage of cells expressing c-myc in the primary (p = 0.56).
CONCLUSION: c-myc expression is independent of metastatic potential and onset of metastases and, therefore, does not serve as a prognostic immunohistochemical marker in primary cutaneous melanoma.