Prosthetics and orthotics international · 2024
Validity and reliability of Glittre activities of daily living test in lower-limb prosthetic users.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Çiftçi Özge, Yurt Yasin, Koltak Cansu, Eker Levent
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Functional capacity assessments have an important role in determining the level of mobility in lower-limb prosthetic users.
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Glittre activities of daily living (ADL) test in lower-limb prosthetic users.
STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study.
METHODS: The study included 66 people over the age of 18 years who had used a lower-limb prosthesis for at least 6 months and could walk at least 30 m independently. For construct validity, the correlation of the Glittre ADL test with the 2-min walk test, timed up and go test, and functional reach test was examined, and Bland-Altman agreement analysis was performed. Intra-rater reliability was examined with 2 tests performed by the same physiotherapist on different days, and inter-rater reliability was examined with a test performed by a second physiotherapist on a different day.
RESULTS: The reliability of the Glittre ADL test was found to be excellent for intra-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.940, 95% confidence interval = 0.903-0.963, standard error of measurement = 26.03, minimal detectable change = 72.31) and good for inter-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.890, 95% confidence interval = 0.806-0.936, standard error of measurement = 36.80, minimal detectable change = 102.06, p < 0.001). There was a strong negative correlation between Glittre ADL test and 2-min walk test (r = -0.785), a strong positive correlation with timed up and go (r = 0.805), and a weak negative correlation with functional reach test (r = -0.266, p < 0.05). Bland-Altman plots showed 95% agreement for both validity and reliability measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: The Glittre ADL test is a valid and reliable test that can be used in the assessment of functional capacity in lower extremity prosthesis users.
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Glittre activities of daily living (ADL) test in lower-limb prosthetic users.
STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study.
METHODS: The study included 66 people over the age of 18 years who had used a lower-limb prosthesis for at least 6 months and could walk at least 30 m independently. For construct validity, the correlation of the Glittre ADL test with the 2-min walk test, timed up and go test, and functional reach test was examined, and Bland-Altman agreement analysis was performed. Intra-rater reliability was examined with 2 tests performed by the same physiotherapist on different days, and inter-rater reliability was examined with a test performed by a second physiotherapist on a different day.
RESULTS: The reliability of the Glittre ADL test was found to be excellent for intra-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.940, 95% confidence interval = 0.903-0.963, standard error of measurement = 26.03, minimal detectable change = 72.31) and good for inter-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.890, 95% confidence interval = 0.806-0.936, standard error of measurement = 36.80, minimal detectable change = 102.06, p < 0.001). There was a strong negative correlation between Glittre ADL test and 2-min walk test (r = -0.785), a strong positive correlation with timed up and go (r = 0.805), and a weak negative correlation with functional reach test (r = -0.266, p < 0.05). Bland-Altman plots showed 95% agreement for both validity and reliability measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: The Glittre ADL test is a valid and reliable test that can be used in the assessment of functional capacity in lower extremity prosthesis users.