Journal of medical physics · 2020
Simultaneous Measurement of In vivo and Transit Mid-Plane Doses with Ionization Chambers in Gynecological Malignancy Patients Undergoing Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kumar Putha Suman, Srinivas Challapalli, Vadhiraja B M, Banerjee Sourjya, Shreyas R, Prakash Saxena P U, Ravichandran Ramamoorthy, Lobo Dilson
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to estimate delivered radiation doses inside planning tumor volume (PTV) using the in vivo (mid-plane dose) measurement and transit measurement methods in gynecological malignancy patients undergoing three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) using calibrated ionization chambers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six patients with histopathologically proven carcinoma of the cervix or endometrium were planned with four-field 3DCRT to the pelvic site. Isocenter was at the geometric mid-plane of PTV with a dose prescription of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Clinical mid-plane dose (D iso, Transit) estimates were done in one method (transit) using the FC-65 positioned at electronic portal imaging device level. In another method, a repeat computerized tomography scan was performed (at the 11th fraction) using CC-13 having a protective cap in the vaginal cavity for in vivo measurements (D in vivo ). Simultaneous measurements were performed with the two chambers from the 11th fraction onward at least 3-4 times during the remaining course of treatment.
RESULTS: The agreement of mean doses from these two described methods and treatment planning system reference doses was in the range of -4.4 ± 1.1% (minimum) to -0.3 ± 2.0% (maximum) and -4.0 ± 1.7% (minimum) to 1.9 ± 2.4% for D in vivo and D iso, Transit , respectively, which are an acceptable range of daily radiation dose delivery.
CONCLUSION: The fundamental importance of this study lies in simultaneous validation of delivered dose in real time with two methods. A study in this small number of patients has given the confidence to apply transit measurements for quality assurance on a routine basis as an accepted clinical dosimetry for the selected patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six patients with histopathologically proven carcinoma of the cervix or endometrium were planned with four-field 3DCRT to the pelvic site. Isocenter was at the geometric mid-plane of PTV with a dose prescription of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Clinical mid-plane dose (D iso, Transit) estimates were done in one method (transit) using the FC-65 positioned at electronic portal imaging device level. In another method, a repeat computerized tomography scan was performed (at the 11th fraction) using CC-13 having a protective cap in the vaginal cavity for in vivo measurements (D in vivo ). Simultaneous measurements were performed with the two chambers from the 11th fraction onward at least 3-4 times during the remaining course of treatment.
RESULTS: The agreement of mean doses from these two described methods and treatment planning system reference doses was in the range of -4.4 ± 1.1% (minimum) to -0.3 ± 2.0% (maximum) and -4.0 ± 1.7% (minimum) to 1.9 ± 2.4% for D in vivo and D iso, Transit , respectively, which are an acceptable range of daily radiation dose delivery.
CONCLUSION: The fundamental importance of this study lies in simultaneous validation of delivered dose in real time with two methods. A study in this small number of patients has given the confidence to apply transit measurements for quality assurance on a routine basis as an accepted clinical dosimetry for the selected patients.