Acta haematologica · 2018
Retrospective Analysis of a New Prognostic Score for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Based on Interim Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu TingBo, Chen LiHong, Pan Jie, Pan LiLi, Hu JianDa, Ji ZhongYou
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The International Prognostic Index (IPI) scoring system is the most widely used prognostic tool for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); however, it fails to consistently identify patients with poor outcomes. This retrospective study was undertaken to confirm the clinical value of a new prognostic score and compare it with the IPI.
METHODS: The aim of this single-center study was to confirm the clinical value of a new prognostic score and its association with various clinical features, disease progression, and death in 70 patients with DLBCL who had undergone at least 6 cycles of chemotherapy.
RESULTS: The IPI and the new prognostic index were both associated with 3-year mortality (p ≤ 0.032); however, only the new prognostic index was associated with 3-year progression (p ≤ 0.036). Multivariate analysis showed that the new prognostic index was associated with 3-year progression but not overall survival. The new prognostic score also distinguished 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival in the low- and low-intermediate-risk groups as well as in the low-intermediate- and high-intermediate-risk groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The new prognostic score represents a comprehensive prognostic model superior to the IPI. Prospective studies are necessary to explore whether treatment strategies may be adjusted using this new prognostic score.
METHODS: The aim of this single-center study was to confirm the clinical value of a new prognostic score and its association with various clinical features, disease progression, and death in 70 patients with DLBCL who had undergone at least 6 cycles of chemotherapy.
RESULTS: The IPI and the new prognostic index were both associated with 3-year mortality (p ≤ 0.032); however, only the new prognostic index was associated with 3-year progression (p ≤ 0.036). Multivariate analysis showed that the new prognostic index was associated with 3-year progression but not overall survival. The new prognostic score also distinguished 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival in the low- and low-intermediate-risk groups as well as in the low-intermediate- and high-intermediate-risk groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The new prognostic score represents a comprehensive prognostic model superior to the IPI. Prospective studies are necessary to explore whether treatment strategies may be adjusted using this new prognostic score.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkersCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective Studies