Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022
Powering single-cell genomics to unravel circulating tumour cell subpopulations in non-small cell lung cancer patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Acheampong Emmanuel, Morici Michael, Abed Afaf, Bowyer Samantha, Asante Du-Bois, Lin Weitao, Millward Michael, Gray Elin S, Beasley Aaron B
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) are attractive "liquid biopsy" candidates that could provide insights into the different phenotypes of tumours present within a patient. The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of CTCs is considered a critical step in tumour metastasis; however, it may confound traditional epithelial feature-based CTC isolation and detection. We applied single-cell copy number alteration (CNA) analysis for the identification of genomic alterations to confirm the neoplastic nature of circulating cells with only mesenchymal phenotypes.
METHODS: We isolated CTCs from blood samples collected from 46 NSCLC patients using the Parsortix system. Enriched cells were subjected to immunofluorescent staining for CTC identification using a multi-marker panel comprising both epithelial and mesenchymal markers. A subset of isolated CTCs was subjected to whole genome amplification (WGA) and low-pass whole-genome sequencing (LP-WGS) for the analysis of copy number alterations (CNAs).
RESULTS: CTCs were detected in 16/46 (34.8%) patients, inclusive of CK+/EpCAM+ CTCs (3/46, 6.5%) and Vim+ CTCs (13/46, 28.3%). Clusters of Vim+ cells were detected in 8 samples, which constitutes 50% of the total number of NSCLC patients with CTCs. No patients had detectable hybrid CK+/EpCAM+/Vim+ cells. All of the tested CK+/EpCAM+ CTCs and 7/8 Vim+ CTCs or CTC clusters carried CNAs confirming their neoplastic nature. Notably, the Vim+ cluster with no CNAs was characterised by spindle morphology and, therefore, defined as normal mesenchymal circulating cells.
CONCLUSION: Our results revealed that CK-negative, vimentin-expressing cells represent a large proportion of CTCs detected in NSCLC patients, which are likely missed by standard epithelial-marker-dependent CTC categorisation.
METHODS: We isolated CTCs from blood samples collected from 46 NSCLC patients using the Parsortix system. Enriched cells were subjected to immunofluorescent staining for CTC identification using a multi-marker panel comprising both epithelial and mesenchymal markers. A subset of isolated CTCs was subjected to whole genome amplification (WGA) and low-pass whole-genome sequencing (LP-WGS) for the analysis of copy number alterations (CNAs).
RESULTS: CTCs were detected in 16/46 (34.8%) patients, inclusive of CK+/EpCAM+ CTCs (3/46, 6.5%) and Vim+ CTCs (13/46, 28.3%). Clusters of Vim+ cells were detected in 8 samples, which constitutes 50% of the total number of NSCLC patients with CTCs. No patients had detectable hybrid CK+/EpCAM+/Vim+ cells. All of the tested CK+/EpCAM+ CTCs and 7/8 Vim+ CTCs or CTC clusters carried CNAs confirming their neoplastic nature. Notably, the Vim+ cluster with no CNAs was characterised by spindle morphology and, therefore, defined as normal mesenchymal circulating cells.
CONCLUSION: Our results revealed that CK-negative, vimentin-expressing cells represent a large proportion of CTCs detected in NSCLC patients, which are likely missed by standard epithelial-marker-dependent CTC categorisation.