Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2007
Is it necessary to do retroperitoneal evaluation in borderline epithelial ovarian tumors?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pirimoglu Zehra Meltem, Afsin Yasemin, Guzelmeric Kadir, Yilmaz Muberra, Unal Orhan, Turan Mehmet Cem
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Borderline epithelial ovarian tumors have good prognosis without any adjuvant therapy. The advantage of aggressive surgical staging, especially retroperitoneal lymph node sampling is questionable in patients with borderline ovarian tumors. We designed this study to evaluate the necessity of retroperitoneal pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection in the treatment of borderline epithelial ovarian tumors.
STUDY DESIGN: From 1998 to 2007, 57 women who were diagnosed with borderline epithelial ovarian tumor in our hospital were prospectively accrued and evaluated; 27 of them (47.3%) had full surgical staging procedure including para-aortic and pelvic node dissection. Student's t-test was used to compare follow-up times.
RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 54.6 (12-96) months for all patients in the study. There was one recurrence of disease, which was in the complete staging group. Follow-up times of patients were not statistically different between lymph node evaluated and non-evaluated groups (p = 0.10). We did not find any metastasis in lymph nodes in 27 women who had complete surgical staging procedure.
CONCLUSION: Patients with borderline epithelial tumors who had full surgical staging procedure do not have survival advantage over those who had no lymph node evaluation and yet were patients with malignant ovarian tumors.
STUDY DESIGN: From 1998 to 2007, 57 women who were diagnosed with borderline epithelial ovarian tumor in our hospital were prospectively accrued and evaluated; 27 of them (47.3%) had full surgical staging procedure including para-aortic and pelvic node dissection. Student's t-test was used to compare follow-up times.
RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 54.6 (12-96) months for all patients in the study. There was one recurrence of disease, which was in the complete staging group. Follow-up times of patients were not statistically different between lymph node evaluated and non-evaluated groups (p = 0.10). We did not find any metastasis in lymph nodes in 27 women who had complete surgical staging procedure.
CONCLUSION: Patients with borderline epithelial tumors who had full surgical staging procedure do not have survival advantage over those who had no lymph node evaluation and yet were patients with malignant ovarian tumors.