Schizophrenia research · 2023
Initial evidence of vowel space reduction in a subset of individuals with schizophrenia.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hogoboom Anya, Rouch Megan, Lauerman Diana, Pauselli Luca, Compton Michael T
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Acoustic phonetic measures have been found to correlate with negative symptoms of schizophrenia, thus offering a path toward quantitative measurement of such symptoms. These acoustic properties include F1 and F2 measurements (affected by tongue height and tongue forward/back position, respectively), which determine a general "vowel space." Among patients and controls, we consider two phonetic measures of vowel space: average Euclidean distance from a participant's mean F1 and mean F2, and density of vowels around one standard deviation of mean F1 and of F2.
METHODS: Structured and spontaneous speech of 148 participants (70 patients and 78 controls) was recorded and measured acoustically. We examined correlations between the phonetic measures of vowel space and ratings of aprosody obtained using two clinical research measures, the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS).
RESULTS: Vowel space measurements were significantly associated with patient/control status, attributed to a cluster of 13 patients whose phonetic values correspond to reduced vowel space as assessed by both phoenetic measures. No correlation was found between phonetic measures and relevant items and averages of ratings on the SANS and CAINS. Reduced vowel space appears to affect only a subset of patients with schizophrenia, potentially those on higher antipsychotic dosages.
CONCLUSIONS: Acoustic phonetic measures may be more sensitive measures of constricted vowel space than clinical research rating scales of aprosody or monotone speech. Replications are needed before further interpretation of this novel finding, including potential medication effects.
METHODS: Structured and spontaneous speech of 148 participants (70 patients and 78 controls) was recorded and measured acoustically. We examined correlations between the phonetic measures of vowel space and ratings of aprosody obtained using two clinical research measures, the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS).
RESULTS: Vowel space measurements were significantly associated with patient/control status, attributed to a cluster of 13 patients whose phonetic values correspond to reduced vowel space as assessed by both phoenetic measures. No correlation was found between phonetic measures and relevant items and averages of ratings on the SANS and CAINS. Reduced vowel space appears to affect only a subset of patients with schizophrenia, potentially those on higher antipsychotic dosages.
CONCLUSIONS: Acoustic phonetic measures may be more sensitive measures of constricted vowel space than clinical research rating scales of aprosody or monotone speech. Replications are needed before further interpretation of this novel finding, including potential medication effects.