Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology · 2020
Cytomorphologic characteristics of next-generation sequencing-positive bile duct brushing specimens.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rosenbaum Matthew W, Arpin Ronald, Limbocker Jessica, Casey Brenna, Le Long, Dudley Jonathan, Iafrate A John, Pitman Martha B
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Cytology of bile duct brushings (BDBs) is a specific, but insensitive, test for malignancy. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of BDBs has recently been shown to improve sensitivity. We analyzed the cytologic features of NGS-positive (NGS+) and NGS-negative (NGS-) BDBs and correlated the morphology with the presence of mutations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 96 BDBs were analyzed for 29 cytologic features by 2 pathologists who were unaware of the original diagnosis and NGS results. Clinicopathologic follow-up was used to determine the patient outcomes (ie, benign, low-grade neoplasm, malignant [carcinoma/high-grade dysplasia]).
RESULTS: We analyzed 74 NGS+ BDBs from 66 patients and 22 NGS- BDBs from 22 patients. During follow-up, 58 of 66 NGS+ patients (88%) had malignancy compared with 0% of NGS- patients (P < 0.001). Fewer than 50% of the malignant cases had been interpreted as malignant on cytology; however, 100% had demonstrated mutations using NGS. Within the NGS+ cases, 53% showed late mutations (TP53, SMAD4, and CDKN2A) supportive of a high-risk stricture. Significant morphologic differences were seen in the background appearance, presence of single cells, architectural disarray, nucleomegaly, anisonucleosis, irregular nuclear borders, increased nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, nuclear hyperchromasia, nucleoli, abnormal groups, clusters, and/or single cells, and overall impression. Naked nuclei, nucleomegaly, anisonucleosis, and coarse chromatin were more common in BDBs with late mutations than in those with KRAS/GNAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog/guanine nucleotide binding protein, α-stimulating complex locus) mutations only. Cytology had a sensitivity of 16% and a specificity of 100% for malignancy. In contrast, NGS had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 73%. Late mutations were 100% specific for malignancy compared with mutations in KRAS/GNAS only, of which 69% were malignant.
CONCLUSIONS: We found significant overlap in the cytomorphologic features between neoplastic and non-neoplastic BDBs, and more than one half of cancer cases had been interpreted as "nonmalignant" on cytology. NGS showing late mutations was 100% specific for malignancy. Adding genetic testing to BDB cytology would be a valuable ancillary test for the detection of malignancy, and reflex testing should be considered.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 96 BDBs were analyzed for 29 cytologic features by 2 pathologists who were unaware of the original diagnosis and NGS results. Clinicopathologic follow-up was used to determine the patient outcomes (ie, benign, low-grade neoplasm, malignant [carcinoma/high-grade dysplasia]).
RESULTS: We analyzed 74 NGS+ BDBs from 66 patients and 22 NGS- BDBs from 22 patients. During follow-up, 58 of 66 NGS+ patients (88%) had malignancy compared with 0% of NGS- patients (P < 0.001). Fewer than 50% of the malignant cases had been interpreted as malignant on cytology; however, 100% had demonstrated mutations using NGS. Within the NGS+ cases, 53% showed late mutations (TP53, SMAD4, and CDKN2A) supportive of a high-risk stricture. Significant morphologic differences were seen in the background appearance, presence of single cells, architectural disarray, nucleomegaly, anisonucleosis, irregular nuclear borders, increased nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, nuclear hyperchromasia, nucleoli, abnormal groups, clusters, and/or single cells, and overall impression. Naked nuclei, nucleomegaly, anisonucleosis, and coarse chromatin were more common in BDBs with late mutations than in those with KRAS/GNAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog/guanine nucleotide binding protein, α-stimulating complex locus) mutations only. Cytology had a sensitivity of 16% and a specificity of 100% for malignancy. In contrast, NGS had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 73%. Late mutations were 100% specific for malignancy compared with mutations in KRAS/GNAS only, of which 69% were malignant.
CONCLUSIONS: We found significant overlap in the cytomorphologic features between neoplastic and non-neoplastic BDBs, and more than one half of cancer cases had been interpreted as "nonmalignant" on cytology. NGS showing late mutations was 100% specific for malignancy. Adding genetic testing to BDB cytology would be a valuable ancillary test for the detection of malignancy, and reflex testing should be considered.