International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2024
Oncological safety of fertility preservation treatment in ovarian cancer: A Spanish multicenter study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Heras Marta, Azcona Leticia, Arencibia Octavio, Minig Lucas, Marti Lola, Hernandez Alicia, Lekuona Arantxa, Niguez Isabel, Gil-Ibañez Blanca, Diaz-Feijoo Berta, Ribot Laia, Cabezas Maria Nieves, Lamarca Marta, Bellon Monica, Alkourdi Amira, Cardenas Laura, Boldo Ana, Amengual Joana, Gorostidi Mikel, Zapardiel Ignacio, YOC‐Care Collaborative Group
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of fertility-sparing treatments for early-stage ovarian cancer in women younger than 40 years old.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter study including women aged 18-40 years diagnosed with early-stage (FIGO I-II) ovarian cancer in 55 Spanish hospitals, from January 2010 to December 2019. Benign and borderline tumors were excluded, as well as advanced stages (FIGO III-IV). All perioperative characteristics and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Standard staging surgery (SSS) was compared with fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in terms of oncological outcomes.
RESULTS: In all, 366 women were included; 327 (89.3%) were stage I. Among all patients, 216 (59%) underwent SSS and 150 (41%) FSS. Up to 208 (56.8%) patients did not have children, but only 12 (3.2%) had oocyte preservation before treatment. Patients in the FSS group compared with the SSS group showed a non-significant difference in recurrences (8% vs. 9.3%, respectively; P < 0.711) and deaths (1.3% vs. 4.8%, respectively; P = 0.211) during the follow-up. No significant differences were found between epithelial and non-epithelial ovarian cancer both in recurrences (7.1% vs. 8.8%, respectively; P = 0.771) and in deaths (1.4% vs. 1.3%, respectively; P = 1) among patients who underwent FSS.
CONCLUSION: FSS seems a safe option for treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer in patients who want to preserve fertility, either for epithelial and non-epithelial histology.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter study including women aged 18-40 years diagnosed with early-stage (FIGO I-II) ovarian cancer in 55 Spanish hospitals, from January 2010 to December 2019. Benign and borderline tumors were excluded, as well as advanced stages (FIGO III-IV). All perioperative characteristics and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Standard staging surgery (SSS) was compared with fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in terms of oncological outcomes.
RESULTS: In all, 366 women were included; 327 (89.3%) were stage I. Among all patients, 216 (59%) underwent SSS and 150 (41%) FSS. Up to 208 (56.8%) patients did not have children, but only 12 (3.2%) had oocyte preservation before treatment. Patients in the FSS group compared with the SSS group showed a non-significant difference in recurrences (8% vs. 9.3%, respectively; P < 0.711) and deaths (1.3% vs. 4.8%, respectively; P = 0.211) during the follow-up. No significant differences were found between epithelial and non-epithelial ovarian cancer both in recurrences (7.1% vs. 8.8%, respectively; P = 0.771) and in deaths (1.4% vs. 1.3%, respectively; P = 1) among patients who underwent FSS.
CONCLUSION: FSS seems a safe option for treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer in patients who want to preserve fertility, either for epithelial and non-epithelial histology.