Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2020
Management of Rectal Stump During Laparoscopic Subtotal Colectomy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comparative Cohort Study from Six Referral Centres.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mege Diane, Stellingwerf Merel E, Germain Adeline, Colombo Francesco, Pellino Gianluca, Di Candido Francesca, Maggiori Léon, Foschi Diego, Buskens Christianne J, Adegbola Samuel, Spinelli Antonino, Warusavitarne Janindra, Bemelman Willem A, Sampietro Gianluca, D'Hoore André, Panis Yves
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is no consensus on the best management of the rectum after subtotal colectomy for refractory colitis complicating inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. The objective was to evaluate the impact of rectal stump management during laparoscopic subtotal colectomy [LSTC] for IBD.
METHODS: Patients who underwent LSTC with double-end ileo-sigmoidostomy [Gr.A] or end ileostomy with closed rectal stump [Gr.B] for IBD were included from a retrospective database of six European referral centres.
RESULTS: In total, 314 patients underwent LSTC and were allocated to Gr.A [n = 102] and B [n = 212]. After LSTC, stoma-related complications occurred more frequently in Gr.A [12%] than in Gr.B [4%, p = 0.01]. Completion proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA] was performed as a three-stage procedure in all patients from Gr.A, and in 88 patients from Gr.B [42%; Gr.B1]. The other 124 patients from Gr.B underwent a modified two-stage procedure [58%; Gr.B2]. The second stage was performed laparoscopically in all patients from Gr.A compared with 73% of Gr.B1 [p < 0.0001] and 65% of Gr.B2 patients [p < 0.0001]. When laparoscopy was intended for 2nd stage IPAA, conversion to laparotomy occurred less frequently in Gr.A when compared with B1 [0 vs 5%, p = 0.06] or B2 [10%, p = 0.001]. When all surgical stages were included [LSCT and IPAA], cumulative stoma-related complications occurred more frequently in Gr.A [n = 19] than in Gr.B1 [n = 6, p = 0.02] and Gr.B2 [n = 6, p = 0.001].
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that both techniques of double-end ileosigmoidostomy and end ileostomy with closed rectal stump are safe and effective for rectal stump management after laparoscopic subtotal colectomy.
METHODS: Patients who underwent LSTC with double-end ileo-sigmoidostomy [Gr.A] or end ileostomy with closed rectal stump [Gr.B] for IBD were included from a retrospective database of six European referral centres.
RESULTS: In total, 314 patients underwent LSTC and were allocated to Gr.A [n = 102] and B [n = 212]. After LSTC, stoma-related complications occurred more frequently in Gr.A [12%] than in Gr.B [4%, p = 0.01]. Completion proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA] was performed as a three-stage procedure in all patients from Gr.A, and in 88 patients from Gr.B [42%; Gr.B1]. The other 124 patients from Gr.B underwent a modified two-stage procedure [58%; Gr.B2]. The second stage was performed laparoscopically in all patients from Gr.A compared with 73% of Gr.B1 [p < 0.0001] and 65% of Gr.B2 patients [p < 0.0001]. When laparoscopy was intended for 2nd stage IPAA, conversion to laparotomy occurred less frequently in Gr.A when compared with B1 [0 vs 5%, p = 0.06] or B2 [10%, p = 0.001]. When all surgical stages were included [LSCT and IPAA], cumulative stoma-related complications occurred more frequently in Gr.A [n = 19] than in Gr.B1 [n = 6, p = 0.02] and Gr.B2 [n = 6, p = 0.001].
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that both techniques of double-end ileosigmoidostomy and end ileostomy with closed rectal stump are safe and effective for rectal stump management after laparoscopic subtotal colectomy.