MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jscai.2026.105454

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026

Matched and Measured: An In-depth Look at the Interventional Cardiology Fellowship Match-Fellows' Perspective.

Khan Naseer A, Saqib Najam U, Meunier Eva, Kereiakes Dean J, Alalawi Luay, Hajouli Said, Saleem Muhammad, Nazir Abubakar

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In July 2024, the interventional cardiology (IC) fellowship match transitioned to the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) to streamline recruitment and ensure transparency. Our prior analysis explored the program directors' (PDs) experiences, revealing positive perceptions despite initial concerns. This current study addresses a critical limitation of the previous work by incorporating the applicants' perspective. The aim of this study is to investigate perceptions of fellows who participated in the IC fellowship for the NRMP match cycles.

METHODS

This descriptive study utilized data from publicly available NRMP and Electronic Residency Application Services along with our survey to evaluate the IC fellowship match from the fellows' perspective. An anonymous online survey was distributed to fellows to gather quantitative and qualitative data. Survey topics included questions about interviews, ranking, and factors influencing rank lists, and satisfaction with the new match system.

RESULTS

An anonymous national fellow survey was completed by 38% (N = 96) of IC fellows, most of whom were applicants to the 2026-2027 IC fellowship match. Seventy percent applied to >30 programs, with the majority receiving >15 invitations. Rank list depth varied, although most applicants ranked multiple programs, most commonly 6 to 10 (30%) or >15 (28%). Prematch offers were rare (13%), and 78% of applicants preferred training at external institutions, whereas the majority preferred virtual interviews. Qualitative responses emphasized procedural volume, program reputation, mentorship, and culture as key drivers of ranking decisions, whereas challenges included limited program information, inconsistent communication, uncertainty around prematch activity, and stress.

CONCLUSIONS

The transition to the NRMP match for IC fellowships presented both successes and challenges from the fellows' viewpoint, complementing the PDs' perspectives documented previously. Our study helps highlight challenges in future IC match.

Для цитирования: Khan Naseer A, Saqib Najam U, Meunier Eva, Kereiakes Dean J, Alalawi Luay, Hajouli Said, Saleem Muhammad, Nazir Abubakar. Matched and Measured: An In-depth Look at the Interventional Cardiology Fellowship Match-Fellows' Perspective.. Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2026.105454.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.