The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists · 1996
Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing adenomyomata.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Phillips D R, Nathanson H G, Milim S J, Haselkorn J S
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosing nodular adenomyosis by percutaneous myometrial biopsies.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: Gynecology department of community hospitals.
PATIENTS: Twenty women with severe dysmenorrhea, chronic menorrhagia, and an MRI diagnosis of adenomyomata.
INTERVENTIONS: Several laparoscopically guided, percutaneous myometrial biopsy specimens were taken in an attempt to confirm histologically an MRI diagnosis of adenomyoma; and resectoscopic endomyometrial biopsy specimens were taken in an attempt to confirm an MRI diagnosis of adenomyosis.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eighteen (90%) of the 20 women had an MRI diagnosis of adenomyosis histologically confirmed by myometrial biopsy. The remaining two (20.0%) had an MRI diagnosis of adenomyosis histologically confirmed by endomyometrial biopsy.
CONCLUSIONS: An MRl diagnosis of adenomyoma was confirmed by transabdominal uterine biopsy in most patients. These results, when combined with those obtained by resectoscopic endomyometrial biopsy, established a diagnosis of adenomyosis in all patients.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: Gynecology department of community hospitals.
PATIENTS: Twenty women with severe dysmenorrhea, chronic menorrhagia, and an MRI diagnosis of adenomyomata.
INTERVENTIONS: Several laparoscopically guided, percutaneous myometrial biopsy specimens were taken in an attempt to confirm histologically an MRI diagnosis of adenomyoma; and resectoscopic endomyometrial biopsy specimens were taken in an attempt to confirm an MRI diagnosis of adenomyosis.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eighteen (90%) of the 20 women had an MRI diagnosis of adenomyosis histologically confirmed by myometrial biopsy. The remaining two (20.0%) had an MRI diagnosis of adenomyosis histologically confirmed by endomyometrial biopsy.
CONCLUSIONS: An MRl diagnosis of adenomyoma was confirmed by transabdominal uterine biopsy in most patients. These results, when combined with those obtained by resectoscopic endomyometrial biopsy, established a diagnosis of adenomyosis in all patients.