BMJ open quality · 2024
Implementing group consultations in a lower limb musculoskeletal outpatient service to improve efficiency and maintain positive patient outcomes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wigham Lisa, Richardson Annette, Moore Kathryn, Martin Michael
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Group consultations (GCs) in healthcare have been shown to improve clinical outcomes with greater efficiency. This project aimed to develop a more efficient musculoskeletal (MSK) physiotherapy-led GC approach for common lower limb problems. This was to help manage an anticipated increase in demand while maintaining high patient satisfaction and ensuring clinical effectiveness.
METHODS: Three 'Plan-Do-Study-Act' (PDSA) cycles were undertaken to test out the new approach of virtual group consultations (VGCs) and face-to-face GCs with MSK patients. These two approaches were tested and refined on four common lower limb conditions: patellofemoral pain syndrome, Achilles tendinopathy, plantar fasciopathy and knee osteoarthritis. We measured the number of patients seen, staff time, patients' experience and patient outcome scores.
RESULTS: Each patient used 45 min of physiotherapy time via the traditional one-to-one physiotherapy consultation approach, this was reduced to 22 min in the VGCs and 12 min for the face-to-face GCs. We found a significant increase in EQ-5D scores (PDSA 1: +0.19, p=0.004 and PDSA 2: +0.17, p=0.002) and the Visual Analogue Score for Pain (PDSA 1: -1.95, p=0.001 and PDSA 2: -2.6, p=0.007) from the first to the second virtual GC sessions.
CONCLUSION: GCs were shown to be an efficient way of providing physiotherapy to patients with lower limb conditions. Feedback from patients attending GCs has shown a good level of effectiveness and patient satisfaction. This alternative way to review and treat patients has yielded a reduction in physiotherapist contact time per patient, improving the efficiency of our MSK service. We did not compare these groups to the one-to-one face-to-face consultations, therefore whether they are better, is unknown.
METHODS: Three 'Plan-Do-Study-Act' (PDSA) cycles were undertaken to test out the new approach of virtual group consultations (VGCs) and face-to-face GCs with MSK patients. These two approaches were tested and refined on four common lower limb conditions: patellofemoral pain syndrome, Achilles tendinopathy, plantar fasciopathy and knee osteoarthritis. We measured the number of patients seen, staff time, patients' experience and patient outcome scores.
RESULTS: Each patient used 45 min of physiotherapy time via the traditional one-to-one physiotherapy consultation approach, this was reduced to 22 min in the VGCs and 12 min for the face-to-face GCs. We found a significant increase in EQ-5D scores (PDSA 1: +0.19, p=0.004 and PDSA 2: +0.17, p=0.002) and the Visual Analogue Score for Pain (PDSA 1: -1.95, p=0.001 and PDSA 2: -2.6, p=0.007) from the first to the second virtual GC sessions.
CONCLUSION: GCs were shown to be an efficient way of providing physiotherapy to patients with lower limb conditions. Feedback from patients attending GCs has shown a good level of effectiveness and patient satisfaction. This alternative way to review and treat patients has yielded a reduction in physiotherapist contact time per patient, improving the efficiency of our MSK service. We did not compare these groups to the one-to-one face-to-face consultations, therefore whether they are better, is unknown.