MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12885-018-4016-3

Медицинская библиотека · BMC cancer · 2018

Performance of a prognostic 31-gene expression profile in an independent cohort of 523 cutaneous melanoma patients.

Zager Jonathan S, Gastman Brian R, Leachman Sancy, Gonzalez Rene C, Fleming Martin D, Ferris Laura K, Ho Jonhan, Miller Alexander R, Cook Robert W, Covington Kyle R, Meldi-Plasseraud Kristen, Middlebrook Brooke, Kaminester Lewis H, Greisinger Anthony, Estrada Sarah I, Pariser David M, Cranmer Lee D, Messina Jane L, Vetto John T, Wayne Jeffrey D, Delman Keith A, Lawson David H, Gerami Pedram

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The heterogeneous behavior of patients with melanoma makes prognostication challenging. To address this, a gene expression profile (GEP) test to predict metastatic risk was previously developed. This study evaluates the GEP's prognostic accuracy in an independent cohort of cutaneous melanoma patients.

METHODS

This multi-center study analyzed primary melanoma tumors from 523 patients, using the GEP to classify patients as Class 1 (low risk) and Class 2 (high risk). Molecular classification was correlated to clinical outcome and assessed along with AJCC v7 staging criteria. Primary endpoints were recurrence-free (RFS) and distant metastasis-free (DMFS) survival.

RESULTS

The 5-year RFS rates for Class 1 and Class 2 were 88% and 52%, respectively, and DMFS rates were 93% versus 60%, respectively (P < 0.001). The GEP was a significant predictor of RFS and DMFS in univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.4 and 6.6, respectively, P < 0.001 for each), along with Breslow thickness, ulceration, mitotic rate, and sentinel lymph node (SLN) status (P < 0.001 for each). GEP, tumor thickness and SLN status were significant predictors of RFS and DMFS in a multivariate model that also included ulceration and mitotic rate (RFS HR = 2.1, 1.2, and 2.5, respectively, P < 0.001 for each; and DMFS HR = 2.7, 1.3 and 3.0, respectively, P < 0.01 for each).

CONCLUSIONS

The GEP test is an objective predictor of metastatic risk and provides additional independent prognostic information to traditional staging to help estimate an individual's risk for recurrence. The assay identified 70% of stage I and II patients who ultimately developed distant metastasis. Its role in consideration of patients for adjuvant therapy should be examined prospectively.

Для цитирования: Zager Jonathan S, Gastman Brian R, Leachman Sancy, Gonzalez Rene C, Fleming Martin D, Ferris Laura K, Ho Jonhan, Miller Alexander R, Cook Robert W, Covington Kyle R, Meldi-Plasseraud Kristen, Middlebrook Brooke, Kaminester Lewis H, Greisinger Anthony, Estrada Sarah I, Pariser David M, Cranmer Lee D, Messina Jane L, Vetto John T, Wayne Jeffrey D, Delman Keith A, Lawson David H, Gerami Pedram. Performance of a prognostic 31-gene expression profile in an independent cohort of 523 cutaneous melanoma patients.. BMC cancer. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4016-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.